Şabāḩ as Sālim vs Umm Qaşr
Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.
Şabāḩ as Sālim has more tree cover — 4.0% against 1.2%.
Umm Qaşr has cleaner air right now — AQI 96 against 97.
- Tree cover gap
- 2.8 points
- Şabāḩ as Sālim is ahead.
- Air quality gap
- 1 AQI
- Umm Qaşr is cleaner.
- Trees between them
- 8.8K
- Şabāḩ as Sālim has more standing.
Kuwait
Iraq
Tree cover
Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.
4.0%
1.2%
Air quality index
US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.
97 · Moderate
96 · Moderate
Trees standing
Estimated from the measured canopy area.
12.6K
3.8K
Trees still needed
To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.
81.7K
90.5K
CO₂ absorbed each year
By the trees already standing.
276K kg
82.9K kg
Air quality in detail
What each city is breathing
Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Şabāḩ as Sālim is read from nearby ground stations and Umm Qaşr is modelled — worth knowing, since the two are not quite like for like.
PM2.5
Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.
34 µg/m³
33.6 µg/m³
The last week, day by day
A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.
| Day | Şabāḩ as Sālim | Umm Qaşr |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Sept | 140 | 136 |
| 23 Sept | 150 | 132 |
| 24 Sept | 239 | 183 |
| 25 Sept | 441 | 254 |
| 26 Sept | 449 | 190 |
| 27 Sept | 157 | 135 |
| 28 Sept | 118 | 144 |
Reading these numbers
What is actually being measured
Tree cover
The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Şabāḩ as Sālim leads here at 4.0%.
Air quality index
The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Şabāḩ as Sālim reads 97 (moderate) and Umm Qaşr reads 96 (moderate) right now.
Frequently asked
Şabāḩ as Sālim and Umm Qaşr, answered
Which has more trees, Şabāḩ as Sālim or Umm Qaşr?
Şabāḩ as Sālim, with roughly 12,566 trees inside its 2 km radius against 3,770. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Şabāḩ as Sālim has the denser canopy at 4.0%.
Which has better air quality, Şabāḩ as Sālim or Umm Qaşr?
Umm Qaşr right now, at AQI 96 against 97 — a gap of 1 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.
How many more trees does each city need?
Şabāḩ as Sālim needs about 81,681 more to reach its canopy target, and Umm Qaşr about 90,478. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.
Are these two measured the same way?
Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.
Keep going
Other comparisons nearby
- Şabāḩ as Sālim vs Kuwait City5% tree cover · AQI 97Compare
- Şabāḩ as Sālim vs Al Aḩmadī1% tree cover · AQI 129Compare
- Şabāḩ as Sālim vs Al Jahrā’1% tree cover · AQI 75Compare
- Şabāḩ as Sālim vs Az Zubayr1% tree cover · AQI 84Compare
- Şabāḩ as Sālim vs Abū al-Kahṣīb6% tree cover · AQI 92Compare
- Şabāḩ as Sālim vs Abadan11% tree cover · AQI 101Compare
Build your own
Compare Şabāḩ as Sālim with somewhere else
This place
Şabāḩ as Sālim
Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.