Skip to content
Airleaf

Prešov vs Satu Mare

Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.

Prešov has more tree cover — 49.3% against 15.9%.

Satu Mare has cleaner air right now — AQI 32 against 41.

Tree cover gap
33.4 points
Prešov is ahead.
Air quality gap
9 AQI
Satu Mare is cleaner.
Trees between them
105K
Prešov has more standing.
Prešov

Slovakia

Satu Mare

Romania

Tree cover

Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.

49.3%

15.9%

Air quality index

US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.

41 · Good

32 · Good

Trees standing

Estimated from the measured canopy area.

155K

49.5K

Trees still needed

To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.

0

43.9K

CO₂ absorbed each year

By the trees already standing.

3.4M kg

1.1M kg

Air quality in detail

What each city is breathing

Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Both are modelled, with no ground station close enough to either.

PM2.5

Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.

9.8 µg/m³

7.6 µg/m³

PM10

Coarser particles — dust, pollen, road grit.

11.4 µg/m³

11.6 µg/m³

Nitrogen dioxide

Mostly traffic and combustion.

6.6 µg/m³

6.3 µg/m³

Ozone

Forms in sunlight; peaks on hot, still afternoons.

33 µg/m³

29 µg/m³

The last week, day by day

A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.

PrešovSatu Mare· daily US EPA index, last 7 days
0255022 Sept25 Sept28 Sept
Daily air quality index for Prešov and Satu Mare
DayPrešovSatu Mare
22 Sept2523
23 Sept2324
24 Sept2729
25 Sept3532
26 Sept4339
27 Sept3640
28 Sept4434

Reading these numbers

What is actually being measured

Tree cover

The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Prešov leads here at 49.3%.

Air quality index

The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Prešov reads 41 (good) and Satu Mare reads 32 (good) right now.

Frequently asked

Prešov and Satu Mare, answered

Which has more trees, Prešov or Satu Mare?

Prešov, with roughly 154,881 trees inside its 2 km radius against 49,502. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Prešov has the denser canopy at 49.3%.

Which has better air quality, Prešov or Satu Mare?

Satu Mare right now, at AQI 32 against 41 — a gap of 9 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.

How many more trees does each city need?

Prešov needs about 0 more to reach its canopy target, and Satu Mare about 43,898. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.

Are these two measured the same way?

Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.

Keep going

Other comparisons nearby

Build your own

Compare Prešov with somewhere else

This place

Prešov

Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.