Mahilyow vs Tartu
Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.
Tartu has more tree cover — 64.4% against 56.5%.
Mahilyow has cleaner air right now — AQI 22 against 24.
- Tree cover gap
- 7.9 points
- Tartu is ahead.
- Air quality gap
- 2 AQI
- Mahilyow is cleaner.
- Trees between them
- 21.5K
- Tartu has more standing.
Tree cover
Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.
56.5%
64.4%
Air quality index
US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.
22 · Good
24 · Good
Trees standing
Estimated from the measured canopy area.
177K
199K
Trees still needed
To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.
0
0
CO₂ absorbed each year
By the trees already standing.
3.9M kg
4.4M kg
Air quality in detail
What each city is breathing
Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Tartu is read from nearby ground stations and Mahilyow is modelled — worth knowing, since the two are not quite like for like.
PM2.5
Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.
5.2 µg/m³
5.7 µg/m³
PM10
Coarser particles — dust, pollen, road grit.
7.7 µg/m³
19 µg/m³
Nitrogen dioxide
Mostly traffic and combustion.
1.5 µg/m³
21.4 µg/m³
Ozone
Forms in sunlight; peaks on hot, still afternoons.
66 µg/m³
17.7 µg/m³
The last week, day by day
A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.
| Day | Mahilyow | Tartu |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Sept | 20 | 24 |
| 23 Sept | 22 | 24 |
| 24 Sept | 23 | 20 |
| 25 Sept | 23 | 22 |
| 26 Sept | 34 | 21 |
| 27 Sept | 37 | 27 |
| 28 Sept | 36 | 25 |
Reading these numbers
What is actually being measured
Tree cover
The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Tartu leads here at 64.4%.
Air quality index
The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Mahilyow reads 22 (good) and Tartu reads 24 (good) right now.
Frequently asked
Mahilyow and Tartu, answered
Which has more trees, Mahilyow or Tartu?
Tartu, with roughly 198,677 trees inside its 2 km radius against 177,145. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Tartu has the denser canopy at 64.4%.
Which has better air quality, Mahilyow or Tartu?
Mahilyow right now, at AQI 22 against 24 — a gap of 2 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.
How many more trees does each city need?
Mahilyow needs about 0 more to reach its canopy target, and Tartu about 0. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.
Are these two measured the same way?
Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.
Keep going
Other comparisons nearby
Build your own
Compare Mahilyow with somewhere else
This place
Mahilyow
Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.