Ljubljana vs Mestre
Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.
Ljubljana has more tree cover — 47.9% against 33.4%.
Mestre has cleaner air right now — AQI 68 against 103.
- Tree cover gap
- 14.5 points
- Ljubljana is ahead.
- Air quality gap
- 35 AQI
- Mestre is cleaner.
- Trees between them
- 45.4K
- Ljubljana has more standing.
Tree cover
Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.
47.9%
33.4%
Air quality index
US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.
103 · Unhealthy for sensitive groups
68 · Moderate
Trees standing
Estimated from the measured canopy area.
150K
105K
Trees still needed
To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.
0
0
CO₂ absorbed each year
By the trees already standing.
3.3M kg
2.3M kg
Air quality in detail
What each city is breathing
Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Ljubljana is read from nearby ground stations and Mestre is modelled — worth knowing, since the two are not quite like for like.
PM2.5
Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.
36.5 µg/m³
20.2 µg/m³
PM10
Coarser particles — dust, pollen, road grit.
19.1 µg/m³
24.8 µg/m³
The last week, day by day
A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.
| Day | Ljubljana | Mestre |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Sept | 37 | 34 |
| 23 Sept | 43 | 30 |
| 24 Sept | 45 | 42 |
| 25 Sept | 42 | 34 |
| 26 Sept | 49 | 43 |
| 27 Sept | 58 | 45 |
| 28 Sept | 91 | 64 |
Reading these numbers
What is actually being measured
Tree cover
The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Ljubljana leads here at 47.9%.
Air quality index
The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Ljubljana reads 103 (unhealthy for sensitive groups) and Mestre reads 68 (moderate) right now.
Frequently asked
Ljubljana and Mestre, answered
Which has more trees, Ljubljana or Mestre?
Ljubljana, with roughly 150,332 trees inside its 2 km radius against 104,929. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Ljubljana has the denser canopy at 47.9%.
Which has better air quality, Ljubljana or Mestre?
Mestre right now, at AQI 68 against 103 — a gap of 35 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.
How many more trees does each city need?
Ljubljana needs about 0 more to reach its canopy target, and Mestre about 0. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.
Are these two measured the same way?
Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.
Keep going
Other comparisons nearby
- Ljubljana vs Novo Mesto65% tree cover · AQI 43Compare
- Ljubljana vs Celje64% tree cover · AQI 56Compare
- Ljubljana vs Klagenfurt am Wörthersee49% tree cover · AQI 47Compare
- Ljubljana vs Trieste32% tree cover · AQI 31Compare
- Ljubljana vs Padua30% tree cover · AQI 84Compare
- Ljubljana vs Vicenza46% tree cover · AQI 95Compare
Build your own
Compare Ljubljana with somewhere else
This place
Ljubljana
Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.