Las Tunas vs Santiago de Cuba
Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.
Las Tunas has more tree cover — 41.9% against 17.7%.
Las Tunas has cleaner air right now — AQI 41 against 59.
- Tree cover gap
- 24.2 points
- Las Tunas is ahead.
- Air quality gap
- 18 AQI
- Las Tunas is cleaner.
- Trees between them
- 77.8K
- Las Tunas has more standing.
Cuba
Cuba
Tree cover
Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.
41.9%
17.7%
Air quality index
US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.
41 · Good
59 · Moderate
Trees standing
Estimated from the measured canopy area.
132K
53.8K
Trees still needed
To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.
0
37.4K
CO₂ absorbed each year
By the trees already standing.
2.9M kg
1.2M kg
Air quality in detail
What each city is breathing
Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Both are modelled, with no ground station close enough to either.
PM2.5
Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.
9.9 µg/m³
16.1 µg/m³
PM10
Coarser particles — dust, pollen, road grit.
14.9 µg/m³
27.2 µg/m³
Nitrogen dioxide
Mostly traffic and combustion.
7.8 µg/m³
5.8 µg/m³
Ozone
Forms in sunlight; peaks on hot, still afternoons.
19 µg/m³
33 µg/m³
The last week, day by day
A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.
| Day | Las Tunas | Santiago de Cuba |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Sept | 30 | 33 |
| 22 Sept | 37 | 32 |
| 23 Sept | 47 | 43 |
| 24 Sept | 38 | 38 |
| 25 Sept | 26 | 30 |
| 26 Sept | 26 | 40 |
| 27 Sept | 34 | 59 |
Reading these numbers
What is actually being measured
Tree cover
The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Las Tunas leads here at 41.9%.
Air quality index
The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Las Tunas reads 41 (good) and Santiago de Cuba reads 59 (moderate) right now.
Frequently asked
Las Tunas and Santiago de Cuba, answered
Which has more trees, Las Tunas or Santiago de Cuba?
Las Tunas, with roughly 131,633 trees inside its 2 km radius against 53,827. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Las Tunas has the denser canopy at 41.9%.
Which has better air quality, Las Tunas or Santiago de Cuba?
Las Tunas right now, at AQI 41 against 59 — a gap of 18 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.
How many more trees does each city need?
Las Tunas needs about 0 more to reach its canopy target, and Santiago de Cuba about 37,405. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.
Are these two measured the same way?
Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.
Keep going
Other comparisons nearby
- Las Tunas vs Manzanillo54% tree cover · AQI 55Compare
- Las Tunas vs Holguín27% tree cover · AQI 39Compare
- Las Tunas vs Bayamo51% tree cover · AQI 57Compare
- Las Tunas vs Camagüey32% tree cover · AQI 15Compare
- Las Tunas vs Palma Soriano69% tree cover · AQI 56Compare
- Las Tunas vs Guantánamo43% tree cover · AQI 56Compare
Build your own
Compare Las Tunas with somewhere else
This place
Las Tunas
Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.