Kragujevac vs Tetovo
Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.
Tetovo has more tree cover — 37.8% against 26.3%.
Tetovo has cleaner air right now — AQI 46 against 56.
- Tree cover gap
- 11.5 points
- Tetovo is ahead.
- Air quality gap
- 10 AQI
- Tetovo is cleaner.
- Trees between them
- 36.2K
- Tetovo has more standing.
Serbia
North Macedonia
Tree cover
Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.
26.3%
37.8%
Air quality index
US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.
56 · Moderate
46 · Good
Trees standing
Estimated from the measured canopy area.
82.5K
119K
Trees still needed
To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.
11.6K
0
CO₂ absorbed each year
By the trees already standing.
1.8M kg
2.6M kg
Air quality in detail
What each city is breathing
Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Tetovo is read from nearby ground stations and Kragujevac is modelled — worth knowing, since the two are not quite like for like.
PM2.5
Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.
14.4 µg/m³
11 µg/m³
PM10
Coarser particles — dust, pollen, road grit.
17.1 µg/m³
50 µg/m³
Nitrogen dioxide
Mostly traffic and combustion.
2.5 µg/m³
13.9 µg/m³
The last week, day by day
A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.
| Day | Kragujevac | Tetovo |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Sept | 29 | 37 |
| 23 Sept | 29 | 30 |
| 24 Sept | 36 | 33 |
| 25 Sept | 45 | 34 |
| 26 Sept | 67 | 33 |
| 27 Sept | 55 | 30 |
| 28 Sept | 61 | 27 |
Reading these numbers
What is actually being measured
Tree cover
The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Tetovo leads here at 37.8%.
Air quality index
The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Kragujevac reads 56 (moderate) and Tetovo reads 46 (good) right now.
Frequently asked
Kragujevac and Tetovo, answered
Which has more trees, Kragujevac or Tetovo?
Tetovo, with roughly 118,752 trees inside its 2 km radius against 82,541. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Tetovo has the denser canopy at 37.8%.
Which has better air quality, Kragujevac or Tetovo?
Tetovo right now, at AQI 46 against 56 — a gap of 10 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.
How many more trees does each city need?
Kragujevac needs about 11,612 more to reach its canopy target, and Tetovo about 0. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.
Are these two measured the same way?
Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.
Keep going
Other comparisons nearby
- Kragujevac vs Čačak30% tree cover · AQI 55Compare
- Kragujevac vs Belgrade19% tree cover · AQI 98Compare
- Kragujevac vs Niš22% tree cover · AQI 37Compare
- Kragujevac vs Mitrovicë26% tree cover · AQI 26Compare
- Kragujevac vs Prizren31% tree cover · AQI 44Compare
- Kragujevac vs Skopje24% tree cover · AQI 24Compare
Build your own
Compare Kragujevac with somewhere else
This place
Kragujevac
Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.