Skip to content
Airleaf

Katowice vs Rzeszów

Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.

Rzeszów has more tree cover — 48.0% against 38.2%.

Katowice has cleaner air right now — AQI 30 against 35.

Tree cover gap
9.8 points
Rzeszów is ahead.
Air quality gap
5 AQI
Katowice is cleaner.
Trees between them
31.9K
Rzeszów has more standing.
Katowice

Poland

Rzeszów

Poland

Tree cover

Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.

38.2%

48.0%

Air quality index

US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.

30 · Good

35 · Good

Trees standing

Estimated from the measured canopy area.

119K

151K

Trees still needed

To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.

0

0

CO₂ absorbed each year

By the trees already standing.

2.6M kg

3.3M kg

Air quality in detail

What each city is breathing

Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Katowice is read from nearby ground stations and Rzeszów is modelled — worth knowing, since the two are not quite like for like.

PM2.5

Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.

7.3 µg/m³

8.3 µg/m³

Ozone

Forms in sunlight; peaks on hot, still afternoons.

44.9 µg/m³

72 µg/m³

The last week, day by day

A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.

KatowiceRzeszów· daily US EPA index, last 7 days
0387522 Sept25 Sept28 Sept
Daily air quality index for Katowice and Rzeszów
DayKatowiceRzeszów
22 Sept3127
23 Sept4231
24 Sept5644
25 Sept5659
26 Sept6860
27 Sept7266
28 Sept7161

Reading these numbers

What is actually being measured

Tree cover

The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Rzeszów leads here at 48.0%.

Air quality index

The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Katowice reads 30 (good) and Rzeszów reads 35 (good) right now.

Frequently asked

Katowice and Rzeszów, answered

Which has more trees, Katowice or Rzeszów?

Rzeszów, with roughly 150,796 trees inside its 2 km radius against 118,929. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Rzeszów has the denser canopy at 48.0%.

Which has better air quality, Katowice or Rzeszów?

Katowice right now, at AQI 30 against 35 — a gap of 5 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.

How many more trees does each city need?

Katowice needs about 0 more to reach its canopy target, and Rzeszów about 0. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.

Are these two measured the same way?

Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.

Keep going

Other comparisons nearby

Build your own

Compare Katowice with somewhere else

This place

Katowice

Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.