Skip to content
Airleaf

Kalulushi vs Lubumbashi

Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.

Kalulushi has more tree cover — 19.2% against 6.0%.

Lubumbashi has cleaner air right now — AQI 107 against 129.

Tree cover gap
13.2 points
Kalulushi is ahead.
Air quality gap
22 AQI
Lubumbashi is cleaner.
Trees between them
41.4K
Kalulushi has more standing.
Kalulushi

Zambia

Lubumbashi

Democratic Republic of the Congo

Tree cover

Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.

19.2%

6.0%

Air quality index

US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.

129 · Unhealthy for sensitive groups

107 · Unhealthy for sensitive groups

Trees standing

Estimated from the measured canopy area.

60.3K

18.9K

Trees still needed

To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.

49.6K

91.1K

CO₂ absorbed each year

By the trees already standing.

1.3M kg

415K kg

Air quality in detail

What each city is breathing

Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Both are modelled, with no ground station close enough to either.

PM2.5

Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.

46.9 µg/m³

38 µg/m³

PM10

Coarser particles — dust, pollen, road grit.

50.4 µg/m³

42.1 µg/m³

Nitrogen dioxide

Mostly traffic and combustion.

3.2 µg/m³

0.7 µg/m³

Ozone

Forms in sunlight; peaks on hot, still afternoons.

86 µg/m³

123 µg/m³

The last week, day by day

A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.

KalulushiLubumbashi· daily US EPA index, last 7 days
07515022 Sept25 Sept28 Sept
Daily air quality index for Kalulushi and Lubumbashi
DayKalulushiLubumbashi
22 Sept8988
23 Sept7166
24 Sept6367
25 Sept6666
26 Sept6870
27 Sept89103
28 Sept128101

Reading these numbers

What is actually being measured

Tree cover

The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Kalulushi leads here at 19.2%.

Air quality index

The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Kalulushi reads 129 (unhealthy for sensitive groups) and Lubumbashi reads 107 (unhealthy for sensitive groups) right now.

Frequently asked

Kalulushi and Lubumbashi, answered

Which has more trees, Kalulushi or Lubumbashi?

Kalulushi, with roughly 60,258 trees inside its 2 km radius against 18,850. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Kalulushi has the denser canopy at 19.2%.

Which has better air quality, Kalulushi or Lubumbashi?

Lubumbashi right now, at AQI 107 against 129 — a gap of 22 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.

How many more trees does each city need?

Kalulushi needs about 49,588 more to reach its canopy target, and Lubumbashi about 91,106. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.

Are these two measured the same way?

Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.

Keep going

Other comparisons nearby

Build your own

Compare Kalulushi with somewhere else

This place

Kalulushi

Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.