Kajansi vs Kitale
Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.
Kitale has more tree cover — 69.0% against 31.5%.
Kitale has cleaner air right now — AQI 12 against 151.
- Tree cover gap
- 37.5 points
- Kitale is ahead.
- Air quality gap
- 139 AQI
- Kitale is cleaner.
- Trees between them
- 118K
- Kitale has more standing.
Tree cover
Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.
31.5%
69.0%
Air quality index
US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.
151 · Unhealthy
12 · Good
Trees standing
Estimated from the measured canopy area.
99.0K
217K
Trees still needed
To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.
26.7K
0
CO₂ absorbed each year
By the trees already standing.
2.2M kg
4.8M kg
Air quality in detail
What each city is breathing
Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Kajansi is read from nearby ground stations and Kitale is modelled — worth knowing, since the two are not quite like for like.
PM2.5
Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.
55.5 µg/m³
2.8 µg/m³
The last week, day by day
A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.
| Day | Kajansi | Kitale |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Sept | 92 | 24 |
| 23 Sept | 79 | 22 |
| 24 Sept | 93 | 31 |
| 25 Sept | 82 | 38 |
| 26 Sept | 98 | 38 |
| 27 Sept | 68 | 33 |
| 28 Sept | 76 | 30 |
Reading these numbers
What is actually being measured
Tree cover
The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Kitale leads here at 69.0%.
Air quality index
The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Kajansi reads 151 (unhealthy) and Kitale reads 12 (good) right now.
Frequently asked
Kajansi and Kitale, answered
Which has more trees, Kajansi or Kitale?
Kitale, with roughly 216,770 trees inside its 2 km radius against 98,960. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Kitale has the denser canopy at 69.0%.
Which has better air quality, Kajansi or Kitale?
Kitale right now, at AQI 12 against 151 — a gap of 139 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.
How many more trees does each city need?
Kajansi needs about 26,704 more to reach its canopy target, and Kitale about 0. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.
Are these two measured the same way?
Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.
Keep going
Other comparisons nearby
Build your own
Compare Kajansi with somewhere else
This place
Kajansi
Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.