Jiangmen vs Tanzhou
Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.
Tanzhou has more tree cover — 28.3% against 25.1%.
Jiangmen has cleaner air right now — AQI 74 against 87.
- Tree cover gap
- 3.2 points
- Tanzhou is ahead.
- Air quality gap
- 13 AQI
- Jiangmen is cleaner.
- Trees between them
- 9.9K
- Tanzhou has more standing.
Tree cover
Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.
25.1%
28.3%
Air quality index
US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.
74 · Moderate
87 · Moderate
Trees standing
Estimated from the measured canopy area.
77.7K
87.6K
Trees still needed
To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.
15.2K
5.3K
CO₂ absorbed each year
By the trees already standing.
1.7M kg
1.9M kg
Air quality in detail
What each city is breathing
Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Both are modelled, with no ground station close enough to either.
PM2.5
Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.
12.5 µg/m³
14.6 µg/m³
PM10
Coarser particles — dust, pollen, road grit.
15.7 µg/m³
18.7 µg/m³
Nitrogen dioxide
Mostly traffic and combustion.
9.5 µg/m³
8.1 µg/m³
Ozone
Forms in sunlight; peaks on hot, still afternoons.
116 µg/m³
154 µg/m³
The last week, day by day
A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.
| Day | Jiangmen | Tanzhou |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Sept | 151 | 125 |
| 23 Sept | 140 | 126 |
| 24 Sept | 115 | 99 |
| 25 Sept | 102 | 89 |
| 26 Sept | 103 | 83 |
| 27 Sept | 60 | 64 |
| 28 Sept | 44 | 44 |
Reading these numbers
What is actually being measured
Tree cover
The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Tanzhou leads here at 28.3%.
Air quality index
The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Jiangmen reads 74 (moderate) and Tanzhou reads 87 (moderate) right now.
Frequently asked
Jiangmen and Tanzhou, answered
Which has more trees, Jiangmen or Tanzhou?
Tanzhou, with roughly 87,573 trees inside its 2 km radius against 77,671. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Tanzhou has the denser canopy at 28.3%.
Which has better air quality, Jiangmen or Tanzhou?
Jiangmen right now, at AQI 74 against 87 — a gap of 13 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.
How many more trees does each city need?
Jiangmen needs about 15,163 more to reach its canopy target, and Tanzhou about 5,261. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.
Are these two measured the same way?
Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.
Keep going
Other comparisons nearby
- Jiangmen vs Shaping25% tree cover · AQI 100Compare
- Jiangmen vs Nantou12% tree cover · AQI 90Compare
- Jiangmen vs Zhongshan26% tree cover · AQI 51Compare
- Jiangmen vs Daliang22% tree cover · AQI 159Compare
- Jiangmen vs Jing’an31% tree cover · AQI 51Compare
- Jiangmen vs San Tung Chung Hang82% tree cover · AQI 93Compare
Build your own
Compare Jiangmen with somewhere else
This place
Jiangmen
Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.