Helsingborg vs Kiel
Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.
Kiel has more tree cover — 46.1% against 42.1%.
Kiel has cleaner air right now — AQI 32 against 39.
- Tree cover gap
- 4.0 points
- Kiel is ahead.
- Air quality gap
- 7 AQI
- Kiel is cleaner.
- Trees between them
- 39.7K
- Kiel has more standing.
Sweden
Germany
Tree cover
Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.
42.1%
46.1%
Air quality index
US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.
39 · Good
32 · Good
Trees standing
Estimated from the measured canopy area.
87.6K
127K
Trees still needed
To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.
0
0
CO₂ absorbed each year
By the trees already standing.
1.9M kg
2.8M kg
Air quality in detail
What each city is breathing
Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Kiel is read from nearby ground stations and Helsingborg is modelled — worth knowing, since the two are not quite like for like.
PM2.5
Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.
9.4 µg/m³
3.2 µg/m³
PM10
Coarser particles — dust, pollen, road grit.
16.9 µg/m³
7.7 µg/m³
Nitrogen dioxide
Mostly traffic and combustion.
6.8 µg/m³
4.5 µg/m³
Ozone
Forms in sunlight; peaks on hot, still afternoons.
68 µg/m³
69.4 µg/m³
The last week, day by day
A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.
| Day | Helsingborg | Kiel |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Sept | 24 | 25 |
| 23 Sept | 23 | 33 |
| 24 Sept | 28 | 29 |
| 25 Sept | 28 | 29 |
| 26 Sept | 37 | 42 |
| 27 Sept | 28 | 39 |
| 28 Sept | 39 | 39 |
Reading these numbers
What is actually being measured
Tree cover
The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Kiel leads here at 46.1%.
Air quality index
The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Helsingborg reads 39 (good) and Kiel reads 32 (good) right now.
Frequently asked
Helsingborg and Kiel, answered
Which has more trees, Helsingborg or Kiel?
Kiel, with roughly 127,303 trees inside its 2 km radius against 87,557. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Kiel has the denser canopy at 46.1%.
Which has better air quality, Helsingborg or Kiel?
Kiel right now, at AQI 32 against 39 — a gap of 7 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.
How many more trees does each city need?
Helsingborg needs about 0 more to reach its canopy target, and Kiel about 0. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.
Are these two measured the same way?
Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.
Keep going
Other comparisons nearby
- Helsingborg vs Copenhagen24% tree cover · AQI 48Compare
- Helsingborg vs Malmö28% tree cover · AQI 33Compare
- Helsingborg vs Århus27% tree cover · AQI 36Compare
- Helsingborg vs Odense49% tree cover · AQI 40Compare
- Helsingborg vs Lübeck52% tree cover · AQI 34Compare
- Helsingborg vs Hamburg24% tree cover · AQI 26Compare
Build your own
Compare Helsingborg with somewhere else
This place
Helsingborg
Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.