Frankfurt am Main vs Koblenz
Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.
Koblenz has more tree cover — 54.8% against 36.7%.
Frankfurt am Main has cleaner air right now — AQI 34 against 37.
- Tree cover gap
- 18.1 points
- Koblenz is ahead.
- Air quality gap
- 3 AQI
- Frankfurt am Main is cleaner.
- Trees between them
- 37.8K
- Koblenz has more standing.
Germany
Germany
Tree cover
Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.
36.7%
54.8%
Air quality index
US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.
34 · Good
37 · Good
Trees standing
Estimated from the measured canopy area.
110K
147K
Trees still needed
To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.
0
0
CO₂ absorbed each year
By the trees already standing.
2.4M kg
3.2M kg
Air quality in detail
What each city is breathing
Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Both are read from nearby ground stations.
PM2.5
Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.
8.2 µg/m³
8.8 µg/m³
PM10
Coarser particles — dust, pollen, road grit.
20.2 µg/m³
20 µg/m³
Nitrogen dioxide
Mostly traffic and combustion.
21.5 µg/m³
22.9 µg/m³
Ozone
Forms in sunlight; peaks on hot, still afternoons.
62.4 µg/m³
49.4 µg/m³
The last week, day by day
A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.
| Day | Frankfurt am Main | Koblenz |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Sept | 44 | 38 |
| 24 Sept | 38 | 36 |
| 25 Sept | 44 | 41 |
| 26 Sept | 58 | 32 |
| 27 Sept | 42 | 43 |
| 28 Sept | 50 | 40 |
| 29 Sept | 53 | 55 |
Reading these numbers
What is actually being measured
Tree cover
The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Koblenz leads here at 54.8%.
Air quality index
The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Frankfurt am Main reads 34 (good) and Koblenz reads 37 (good) right now.
Frequently asked
Frankfurt am Main and Koblenz, answered
Which has more trees, Frankfurt am Main or Koblenz?
Koblenz, with roughly 147,368 trees inside its 2 km radius against 109,532. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Koblenz has the denser canopy at 54.8%.
Which has better air quality, Frankfurt am Main or Koblenz?
Frankfurt am Main right now, at AQI 34 against 37 — a gap of 3 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.
How many more trees does each city need?
Frankfurt am Main needs about 0 more to reach its canopy target, and Koblenz about 0. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.
Are these two measured the same way?
Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.
Keep going
Other comparisons nearby
- Frankfurt am Main vs Darmstadt41% tree cover · AQI 37Compare
- Frankfurt am Main vs Wiesbaden61% tree cover · AQI 26Compare
- Frankfurt am Main vs Mainz56% tree cover · AQI 35Compare
- Frankfurt am Main vs Mannheim28% tree cover · AQI 56Compare
- Frankfurt am Main vs Bonn52% tree cover · AQI 58Compare
- Frankfurt am Main vs Siegen70% tree cover · AQI 45Compare
Build your own
Compare Frankfurt am Main with somewhere else
This place
Frankfurt am Main
Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.