Farrukhābād vs Kanpur
Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.
Kanpur has more tree cover — 27.0% against 25.6%.
Farrukhābād has cleaner air right now — AQI 82 against 85.
- Tree cover gap
- 1.4 points
- Kanpur is ahead.
- Air quality gap
- 3 AQI
- Farrukhābād is cleaner.
- Trees between them
- 2.7K
- Kanpur has more standing.
India
India
Tree cover
Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.
25.6%
27.0%
Air quality index
US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.
82 · Moderate
85 · Moderate
Trees standing
Estimated from the measured canopy area.
80.4K
83.1K
Trees still needed
To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.
13.8K
9.2K
CO₂ absorbed each year
By the trees already standing.
1.8M kg
1.8M kg
Air quality in detail
What each city is breathing
Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Both are modelled, with no ground station close enough to either.
PM2.5
Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.
26.7 µg/m³
28.3 µg/m³
PM10
Coarser particles — dust, pollen, road grit.
86.8 µg/m³
49.1 µg/m³
Nitrogen dioxide
Mostly traffic and combustion.
1.9 µg/m³
1.5 µg/m³
Ozone
Forms in sunlight; peaks on hot, still afternoons.
124 µg/m³
165 µg/m³
The last week, day by day
A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.
| Day | Farrukhābād | Kanpur |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Sept | 103 | 86 |
| 23 Sept | 113 | 79 |
| 24 Sept | 50 | 44 |
| 25 Sept | 36 | 28 |
| 26 Sept | 41 | 40 |
| 27 Sept | 69 | 73 |
Reading these numbers
What is actually being measured
Tree cover
The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Kanpur leads here at 27.0%.
Air quality index
The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Farrukhābād reads 82 (moderate) and Kanpur reads 85 (moderate) right now.
Frequently asked
Farrukhābād and Kanpur, answered
Which has more trees, Farrukhābād or Kanpur?
Kanpur, with roughly 83,127 trees inside its 2 km radius against 80,425. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Kanpur has the denser canopy at 27.0%.
Which has better air quality, Farrukhābād or Kanpur?
Farrukhābād right now, at AQI 82 against 85 — a gap of 3 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.
How many more trees does each city need?
Farrukhābād needs about 13,823 more to reach its canopy target, and Kanpur about 9,236. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.
Are these two measured the same way?
Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.
Keep going
Other comparisons nearby
- Farrukhābād vs Hardoī23% tree cover · AQI 68Compare
- Farrukhābād vs Shāhjānpur35% tree cover · AQI 59Compare
- Farrukhābād vs Budaun46% tree cover · AQI 40Compare
- Farrukhābād vs Etāwah43% tree cover · AQI 93Compare
- Farrukhābād vs Unnāo33% tree cover · AQI 85Compare
- Farrukhābād vs Lucknow8% tree cover · AQI 83Compare
Build your own
Compare Farrukhābād with somewhere else
This place
Farrukhābād
Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.