Encarnación vs Umuarama
Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.
Encarnación has more tree cover — 42.7% against 40.4%.
Encarnación has cleaner air right now — AQI 53 against 61.
- Tree cover gap
- 2.3 points
- Encarnación is ahead.
- Air quality gap
- 8 AQI
- Encarnación is cleaner.
- Trees between them
- 43.5K
- Umuarama has more standing.
Paraguay
Brazil
Tree cover
Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.
42.7%
40.4%
Air quality index
US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.
53 · Moderate
61 · Moderate
Trees standing
Estimated from the measured canopy area.
83.4K
127K
Trees still needed
To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.
0
0
CO₂ absorbed each year
By the trees already standing.
1.8M kg
2.8M kg
Air quality in detail
What each city is breathing
Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Encarnación is read from nearby ground stations and Umuarama is modelled — worth knowing, since the two are not quite like for like.
PM2.5
Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.
12.9 µg/m³
16.7 µg/m³
PM10
Coarser particles — dust, pollen, road grit.
13.3 µg/m³
17.4 µg/m³
The last week, day by day
A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.
| Day | Encarnación | Umuarama |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Sept | 23 | 41 |
| 23 Sept | 23 | 31 |
| 24 Sept | 33 | 43 |
| 25 Sept | 48 | 51 |
| 26 Sept | 39 | 61 |
| 27 Sept | 36 | 58 |
| 28 Sept | 33 | 61 |
Reading these numbers
What is actually being measured
Tree cover
The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Encarnación leads here at 42.7%.
Air quality index
The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Encarnación reads 53 (moderate) and Umuarama reads 61 (moderate) right now.
Frequently asked
Encarnación and Umuarama, answered
Which has more trees, Encarnación or Umuarama?
Umuarama, with roughly 126,920 trees inside its 2 km radius against 83,439. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Encarnación has the denser canopy at 42.7%.
Which has better air quality, Encarnación or Umuarama?
Encarnación right now, at AQI 53 against 61 — a gap of 8 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.
How many more trees does each city need?
Encarnación needs about 0 more to reach its canopy target, and Umuarama about 0. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.
Are these two measured the same way?
Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.
Keep going
Other comparisons nearby
- Encarnación vs Ituzaingó71% tree cover · AQI 32Compare
- Encarnación vs Foz do Iguaçu49% tree cover · AQI 49Compare
- Encarnación vs Ciudad del Este39% tree cover · AQI 63Compare
- Encarnación vs Itauguá71% tree cover · AQI 70Compare
- Encarnación vs Campo Mourão32% tree cover · AQI 63Compare
- Encarnación vs Toledo38% tree cover · AQI 55Compare
Build your own
Compare Encarnación with somewhere else
This place
Encarnación
Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.