Skip to content
Airleaf

Dos Hermanas vs Jerez de la Frontera

Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.

Jerez de la Frontera has more tree cover — 11.1% against 5.7%.

Jerez de la Frontera has cleaner air right now — AQI 40 against 53.

Tree cover gap
5.4 points
Jerez de la Frontera is ahead.
Air quality gap
13 AQI
Jerez de la Frontera is cleaner.
Trees between them
17.0K
Jerez de la Frontera has more standing.

Tree cover

Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.

5.7%

11.1%

Air quality index

US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.

53 · Moderate

40 · Good

Trees standing

Estimated from the measured canopy area.

17.9K

34.9K

Trees still needed

To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.

76.3K

59.4K

CO₂ absorbed each year

By the trees already standing.

394K kg

767K kg

Air quality in detail

What each city is breathing

Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Dos Hermanas is read from nearby ground stations and Jerez de la Frontera is modelled — worth knowing, since the two are not quite like for like.

PM2.5

Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.

13.1 µg/m³

8 µg/m³

PM10

Coarser particles — dust, pollen, road grit.

21.4 µg/m³

15 µg/m³

Nitrogen dioxide

Mostly traffic and combustion.

5 µg/m³

6.8 µg/m³

Ozone

Forms in sunlight; peaks on hot, still afternoons.

64 µg/m³

74 µg/m³

The last week, day by day

A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.

Dos HermanasJerez de la Frontera· daily US EPA index, last 7 days
0255022 Sept25 Sept28 Sept
Daily air quality index for Dos Hermanas and Jerez de la Frontera
DayDos HermanasJerez de la Frontera
22 Sept3737
23 Sept4333
24 Sept3934
25 Sept4335
26 Sept4136
27 Sept3239
28 Sept3744

Reading these numbers

What is actually being measured

Tree cover

The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Jerez de la Frontera leads here at 11.1%.

Air quality index

The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Dos Hermanas reads 53 (moderate) and Jerez de la Frontera reads 40 (good) right now.

Frequently asked

Dos Hermanas and Jerez de la Frontera, answered

Which has more trees, Dos Hermanas or Jerez de la Frontera?

Jerez de la Frontera, with roughly 34,872 trees inside its 2 km radius against 17,907. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Jerez de la Frontera has the denser canopy at 11.1%.

Which has better air quality, Dos Hermanas or Jerez de la Frontera?

Jerez de la Frontera right now, at AQI 40 against 53 — a gap of 13 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.

How many more trees does each city need?

Dos Hermanas needs about 76,341 more to reach its canopy target, and Jerez de la Frontera about 59,376. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.

Are these two measured the same way?

Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.

Keep going

Other comparisons nearby

Build your own

Compare Dos Hermanas with somewhere else

This place

Dos Hermanas

Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.