Dammam vs Umm Ghuwaylīnah
Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.
Dammam has more tree cover — 1.9% against 0.2%.
Umm Ghuwaylīnah has cleaner air right now — AQI 131 against 135.
- Tree cover gap
- 1.7 points
- Dammam is ahead.
- Air quality gap
- 4 AQI
- Umm Ghuwaylīnah is cleaner.
- Trees between them
- 5.3K
- Dammam has more standing.
Saudi Arabia
Qatar
Tree cover
Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.
1.9%
0.2%
Air quality index
US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.
135 · Unhealthy for sensitive groups
131 · Unhealthy for sensitive groups
Trees standing
Estimated from the measured canopy area.
6.0K
628
Trees still needed
To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.
104K
109K
CO₂ absorbed each year
By the trees already standing.
131K kg
13.8K kg
Air quality in detail
What each city is breathing
Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Dammam is read from nearby ground stations and Umm Ghuwaylīnah is modelled — worth knowing, since the two are not quite like for like.
PM2.5
Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.
49.5 µg/m³
47.8 µg/m³
The last week, day by day
A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.
| Day | Dammam | Umm Ghuwaylīnah |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Sept | 130 | 124 |
| 23 Sept | 140 | 134 |
| 24 Sept | 158 | 138 |
| 25 Sept | 161 | 148 |
| 26 Sept | 121 | 127 |
| 27 Sept | 149 | 129 |
| 28 Sept | 136 | 123 |
Reading these numbers
What is actually being measured
Tree cover
The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Dammam leads here at 1.9%.
Air quality index
The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Dammam reads 135 (unhealthy for sensitive groups) and Umm Ghuwaylīnah reads 131 (unhealthy for sensitive groups) right now.
Frequently asked
Dammam and Umm Ghuwaylīnah, answered
Which has more trees, Dammam or Umm Ghuwaylīnah?
Dammam, with roughly 5,969 trees inside its 2 km radius against 628. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Dammam has the denser canopy at 1.9%.
Which has better air quality, Dammam or Umm Ghuwaylīnah?
Umm Ghuwaylīnah right now, at AQI 131 against 135 — a gap of 4 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.
How many more trees does each city need?
Dammam needs about 103,987 more to reach its canopy target, and Umm Ghuwaylīnah about 109,327. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.
Are these two measured the same way?
Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.
Keep going
Other comparisons nearby
Build your own
Compare Dammam with somewhere else
This place
Dammam
Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.