Copenhagen vs Örebro
Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.
Örebro has more tree cover — 46.5% against 23.9%.
Örebro has cleaner air right now — AQI 30 against 32.
- Tree cover gap
- 22.6 points
- Örebro is ahead.
- Air quality gap
- 2 AQI
- Örebro is cleaner.
- Trees between them
- 76.4K
- Örebro has more standing.
Denmark
Sweden
Tree cover
Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.
23.9%
46.5%
Air quality index
US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.
32 · Good
30 · Good
Trees standing
Estimated from the measured canopy area.
68.7K
145K
Trees still needed
To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.
17.5K
0
CO₂ absorbed each year
By the trees already standing.
1.5M kg
3.2M kg
Air quality in detail
What each city is breathing
Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Copenhagen is read from nearby ground stations and Örebro is modelled — worth knowing, since the two are not quite like for like.
PM2.5
Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.
7.6 µg/m³
7.3 µg/m³
Nitrogen dioxide
Mostly traffic and combustion.
0.2 µg/m³
1.9 µg/m³
The last week, day by day
A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.
| Day | Copenhagen | Örebro |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Sept | 24 | 22 |
| 23 Sept | 30 | 20 |
| 24 Sept | 25 | 21 |
| 25 Sept | 29 | 18 |
| 26 Sept | 40 | 25 |
| 27 Sept | 30 | 25 |
| 28 Sept | 42 | 24 |
Reading these numbers
What is actually being measured
Tree cover
The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Örebro leads here at 46.5%.
Air quality index
The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Copenhagen reads 32 (good) and Örebro reads 30 (good) right now.
Frequently asked
Copenhagen and Örebro, answered
Which has more trees, Copenhagen or Örebro?
Örebro, with roughly 145,061 trees inside its 2 km radius against 68,702. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Örebro has the denser canopy at 46.5%.
Which has better air quality, Copenhagen or Örebro?
Örebro right now, at AQI 30 against 32 — a gap of 2 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.
How many more trees does each city need?
Copenhagen needs about 17,535 more to reach its canopy target, and Örebro about 0. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.
Are these two measured the same way?
Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.
Keep going
Other comparisons nearby
- Copenhagen vs Malmö28% tree cover · AQI 46Compare
- Copenhagen vs Helsingborg42% tree cover · AQI 37Compare
- Copenhagen vs Odense49% tree cover · AQI 40Compare
- Copenhagen vs Århus27% tree cover · AQI 36Compare
- Copenhagen vs Västerås51% tree cover · AQI 30Compare
- Copenhagen vs Linköping41% tree cover · AQI 27Compare
Build your own
Compare Copenhagen with somewhere else
This place
Copenhagen
Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.