Choibalsan vs Ulan Bator
Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.
Choibalsan has more tree cover — 31.5% against 8.1%.
Ulan Bator has cleaner air right now — AQI 24 against 32.
- Tree cover gap
- 23.4 points
- Choibalsan is ahead.
- Air quality gap
- 8 AQI
- Ulan Bator is cleaner.
- Trees between them
- 73.0K
- Choibalsan has more standing.
Mongolia
Mongolia
Tree cover
Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.
31.5%
8.1%
Air quality index
US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.
32 · Good
24 · Good
Trees standing
Estimated from the measured canopy area.
98.5K
25.4K
Trees still needed
To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.
0
68.8K
CO₂ absorbed each year
By the trees already standing.
2.2M kg
560K kg
Air quality in detail
What each city is breathing
Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Both are modelled, with no ground station close enough to either.
PM2.5
Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.
7.6 µg/m³
1.9 µg/m³
PM10
Coarser particles — dust, pollen, road grit.
16.6 µg/m³
2 µg/m³
Nitrogen dioxide
Mostly traffic and combustion.
0.7 µg/m³
3 µg/m³
Ozone
Forms in sunlight; peaks on hot, still afternoons.
72 µg/m³
64 µg/m³
The last week, day by day
A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.
| Day | Choibalsan | Ulan Bator |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Sept | 28 | 65 |
| 23 Sept | 31 | 66 |
| 24 Sept | 33 | 43 |
| 25 Sept | 31 | 95 |
| 26 Sept | 29 | 62 |
| 27 Sept | 29 | 46 |
| 28 Sept | 34 | 37 |
Reading these numbers
What is actually being measured
Tree cover
The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Choibalsan leads here at 31.5%.
Air quality index
The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Choibalsan reads 32 (good) and Ulan Bator reads 24 (good) right now.
Frequently asked
Choibalsan and Ulan Bator, answered
Which has more trees, Choibalsan or Ulan Bator?
Choibalsan, with roughly 98,465 trees inside its 2 km radius against 25,447. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Choibalsan has the denser canopy at 31.5%.
Which has better air quality, Choibalsan or Ulan Bator?
Ulan Bator right now, at AQI 24 against 32 — a gap of 8 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.
How many more trees does each city need?
Choibalsan needs about 0 more to reach its canopy target, and Ulan Bator about 68,801. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.
Are these two measured the same way?
Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.
Keep going
Other comparisons nearby
- Choibalsan vs Jalai Nur33% tree cover · AQI 32Compare
- Choibalsan vs Hulunbuir26% tree cover · AQI 27Compare
- Choibalsan vs Chita36% tree cover · AQI 33Compare
- Choibalsan vs Yakeshi48% tree cover · AQI 30Compare
- Choibalsan vs Nalayh1% tree cover · AQI 24Compare
- Choibalsan vs Darhan30% tree cover · AQI 39Compare
Build your own
Compare Choibalsan with somewhere else
This place
Choibalsan
Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.