Skip to content
Airleaf

Chernivtsi vs Cluj-Napoca

Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.

Chernivtsi has more tree cover — 56.5% against 35.8%.

Cluj-Napoca has cleaner air right now — AQI 30 against 41.

Tree cover gap
20.7 points
Chernivtsi is ahead.
Air quality gap
11 AQI
Cluj-Napoca is cleaner.
Trees between them
65.0K
Chernivtsi has more standing.
Chernivtsi

Ukraine

Tree cover

Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.

56.5%

35.8%

Air quality index

US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.

41 · Good

30 · Good

Trees standing

Estimated from the measured canopy area.

177K

112K

Trees still needed

To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.

0

0

CO₂ absorbed each year

By the trees already standing.

3.9M kg

2.5M kg

Air quality in detail

What each city is breathing

Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Cluj-Napoca is read from nearby ground stations and Chernivtsi is modelled — worth knowing, since the two are not quite like for like.

PM2.5

Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.

9.8 µg/m³

7.2 µg/m³

PM10

Coarser particles — dust, pollen, road grit.

12.4 µg/m³

10.3 µg/m³

Nitrogen dioxide

Mostly traffic and combustion.

9 µg/m³

39.1 µg/m³

Ozone

Forms in sunlight; peaks on hot, still afternoons.

26 µg/m³

32.7 µg/m³

The last week, day by day

A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.

ChernivtsiCluj-Napoca· daily US EPA index, last 7 days
0387522 Sept25 Sept28 Sept
Daily air quality index for Chernivtsi and Cluj-Napoca
DayChernivtsiCluj-Napoca
22 Sept2226
23 Sept2223
24 Sept2728
25 Sept2836
26 Sept4345
27 Sept4941
28 Sept5448

Reading these numbers

What is actually being measured

Tree cover

The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Chernivtsi leads here at 56.5%.

Air quality index

The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Chernivtsi reads 41 (good) and Cluj-Napoca reads 30 (good) right now.

Frequently asked

Chernivtsi and Cluj-Napoca, answered

Which has more trees, Chernivtsi or Cluj-Napoca?

Chernivtsi, with roughly 177,322 trees inside its 2 km radius against 112,357. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Chernivtsi has the denser canopy at 56.5%.

Which has better air quality, Chernivtsi or Cluj-Napoca?

Cluj-Napoca right now, at AQI 30 against 41 — a gap of 11 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.

How many more trees does each city need?

Chernivtsi needs about 0 more to reach its canopy target, and Cluj-Napoca about 0. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.

Are these two measured the same way?

Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.

Keep going

Other comparisons nearby

Build your own

Compare Chernivtsi with somewhere else

This place

Chernivtsi

Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.