Catamarca vs Santa Fe
Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.
Santa Fe has more tree cover — 23.5% against 5.7%.
Santa Fe has cleaner air right now — AQI 24 against 116.
- Tree cover gap
- 17.8 points
- Santa Fe is ahead.
- Air quality gap
- 92 AQI
- Santa Fe is cleaner.
- Trees between them
- 48.9K
- Santa Fe has more standing.
Tree cover
Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.
5.7%
23.5%
Air quality index
US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.
116 · Unhealthy for sensitive groups
24 · Good
Trees standing
Estimated from the measured canopy area.
17.9K
66.8K
Trees still needed
To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.
92.0K
18.5K
CO₂ absorbed each year
By the trees already standing.
394K kg
1.5M kg
Air quality in detail
What each city is breathing
Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Both are modelled, with no ground station close enough to either.
PM2.5
Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.
41.4 µg/m³
4.6 µg/m³
PM10
Coarser particles — dust, pollen, road grit.
43.2 µg/m³
4.7 µg/m³
Nitrogen dioxide
Mostly traffic and combustion.
10 µg/m³
4.8 µg/m³
Ozone
Forms in sunlight; peaks on hot, still afternoons.
97 µg/m³
38 µg/m³
The last week, day by day
A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.
| Day | Catamarca | Santa Fe |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Sept | 30 | 24 |
| 23 Sept | 28 | 25 |
| 24 Sept | 31 | 26 |
| 25 Sept | 35 | 33 |
| 26 Sept | 55 | 37 |
| 27 Sept | 83 | 33 |
| 28 Sept | 125 | 26 |
Reading these numbers
What is actually being measured
Tree cover
The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Santa Fe leads here at 23.5%.
Air quality index
The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Catamarca reads 116 (unhealthy for sensitive groups) and Santa Fe reads 24 (good) right now.
Frequently asked
Catamarca and Santa Fe, answered
Which has more trees, Catamarca or Santa Fe?
Santa Fe, with roughly 66,814 trees inside its 2 km radius against 17,907. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Santa Fe has the denser canopy at 23.5%.
Which has better air quality, Catamarca or Santa Fe?
Santa Fe right now, at AQI 24 against 116 — a gap of 92 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.
How many more trees does each city need?
Catamarca needs about 92,049 more to reach its canopy target, and Santa Fe about 18,480. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.
Are these two measured the same way?
Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.
Keep going
Other comparisons nearby
- Catamarca vs La Rioja4% tree cover · AQI 50Compare
- Catamarca vs Santiago del Estero6% tree cover · AQI 107Compare
- Catamarca vs San Miguel de Tucumán12% tree cover · AQI 102Compare
- Catamarca vs Córdoba8% tree cover · AQI 40Compare
- Catamarca vs Paraná24% tree cover · AQI 32Compare
- Catamarca vs Rosario22% tree cover · AQI 26Compare
Build your own
Compare Catamarca with somewhere else
This place
Catamarca
Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.