Skip to content
Airleaf

Čačak vs Mitrovicë

Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.

Čačak has more tree cover — 29.6% against 25.5%.

Mitrovicë has cleaner air right now — AQI 26 against 55.

Tree cover gap
4.1 points
Čačak is ahead.
Air quality gap
29 AQI
Mitrovicë is cleaner.
Trees between them
12.9K
Čačak has more standing.
Čačak

Serbia

Tree cover

Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.

29.6%

25.5%

Air quality index

US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.

55 · Moderate

26 · Good

Trees standing

Estimated from the measured canopy area.

92.9K

80.0K

Trees still needed

To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.

1.3K

14.1K

CO₂ absorbed each year

By the trees already standing.

2.0M kg

1.8M kg

Air quality in detail

What each city is breathing

Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Both are modelled, with no ground station close enough to either.

PM2.5

Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.

14 µg/m³

6.3 µg/m³

PM10

Coarser particles — dust, pollen, road grit.

15.2 µg/m³

7.6 µg/m³

Nitrogen dioxide

Mostly traffic and combustion.

3.5 µg/m³

1 µg/m³

Ozone

Forms in sunlight; peaks on hot, still afternoons.

81 µg/m³

76 µg/m³

The last week, day by day

A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.

ČačakMitrovicë· daily US EPA index, last 7 days
0387522 Sept25 Sept28 Sept
Daily air quality index for Čačak and Mitrovicë
DayČačakMitrovicë
22 Sept2730
23 Sept3231
24 Sept3639
25 Sept3541
26 Sept6335
27 Sept5837
28 Sept5643

Reading these numbers

What is actually being measured

Tree cover

The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Čačak leads here at 29.6%.

Air quality index

The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Čačak reads 55 (moderate) and Mitrovicë reads 26 (good) right now.

Frequently asked

Čačak and Mitrovicë, answered

Which has more trees, Čačak or Mitrovicë?

Čačak, with roughly 92,898 trees inside its 2 km radius against 79,950. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Čačak has the denser canopy at 29.6%.

Which has better air quality, Čačak or Mitrovicë?

Mitrovicë right now, at AQI 26 against 55 — a gap of 29 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.

How many more trees does each city need?

Čačak needs about 1,255 more to reach its canopy target, and Mitrovicë about 14,109. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.

Are these two measured the same way?

Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.

Keep going

Other comparisons nearby

Build your own

Compare Čačak with somewhere else

This place

Čačak

Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.