Skip to content
Airleaf

Buzău vs Piatra Neamţ

Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.

Piatra Neamţ has more tree cover — 97.8% against 41.3%.

Piatra Neamţ has cleaner air right now — AQI 28 against 30.

Tree cover gap
56.5 points
Piatra Neamţ is ahead.
Air quality gap
2 AQI
Piatra Neamţ is cleaner.
Trees between them
165K
Piatra Neamţ has more standing.
Buzău

Romania

Tree cover

Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.

41.3%

97.8%

Air quality index

US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.

30 · Good

28 · Good

Trees standing

Estimated from the measured canopy area.

129K

294K

Trees still needed

To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.

0

0

CO₂ absorbed each year

By the trees already standing.

2.8M kg

6.5M kg

Air quality in detail

What each city is breathing

Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Piatra Neamţ is read from nearby ground stations and Buzău is modelled — worth knowing, since the two are not quite like for like.

PM2.5

Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.

5.3 µg/m³

6.8 µg/m³

The last week, day by day

A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.

BuzăuPiatra Neamţ· daily US EPA index, last 7 days
0255022 Sept25 Sept28 Sept
Daily air quality index for Buzău and Piatra Neamţ
DayBuzăuPiatra Neamţ
22 Sept2723
23 Sept2521
24 Sept2625
25 Sept2829
26 Sept2836
27 Sept2736
28 Sept2930

Reading these numbers

What is actually being measured

Tree cover

The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Piatra Neamţ leads here at 97.8%.

Air quality index

The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Buzău reads 30 (good) and Piatra Neamţ reads 28 (good) right now.

Frequently asked

Buzău and Piatra Neamţ, answered

Which has more trees, Buzău or Piatra Neamţ?

Piatra Neamţ, with roughly 294,036 trees inside its 2 km radius against 129,229. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Piatra Neamţ has the denser canopy at 97.8%.

Which has better air quality, Buzău or Piatra Neamţ?

Piatra Neamţ right now, at AQI 28 against 30 — a gap of 2 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.

How many more trees does each city need?

Buzău needs about 0 more to reach its canopy target, and Piatra Neamţ about 0. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.

Are these two measured the same way?

Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.

Keep going

Other comparisons nearby

Build your own

Compare Buzău with somewhere else

This place

Buzău

Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.