Budapest vs Katowice
Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.
Katowice has more tree cover — 38.2% against 29.1%.
Katowice has cleaner air right now — AQI 30 against 57.
- Tree cover gap
- 9.1 points
- Katowice is ahead.
- Air quality gap
- 27 AQI
- Katowice is cleaner.
- Trees between them
- 37.7K
- Katowice has more standing.
Tree cover
Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.
29.1%
38.2%
Air quality index
US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.
57 · Moderate
30 · Good
Trees standing
Estimated from the measured canopy area.
81.3K
119K
Trees still needed
To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.
2.5K
0
CO₂ absorbed each year
By the trees already standing.
1.8M kg
2.6M kg
Air quality in detail
What each city is breathing
Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Both are read from nearby ground stations.
PM2.5
Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.
14.9 µg/m³
7.3 µg/m³
Ozone
Forms in sunlight; peaks on hot, still afternoons.
17.8 µg/m³
44.9 µg/m³
The last week, day by day
A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.
| Day | Budapest | Katowice |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Sept | 28 | 31 |
| 23 Sept | 25 | 42 |
| 24 Sept | 29 | 56 |
| 25 Sept | 31 | 56 |
| 26 Sept | 41 | 68 |
| 27 Sept | 55 | 72 |
| 28 Sept | 52 | 71 |
Reading these numbers
What is actually being measured
Tree cover
The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Katowice leads here at 38.2%.
Air quality index
The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Budapest reads 57 (moderate) and Katowice reads 30 (good) right now.
Frequently asked
Budapest and Katowice, answered
Which has more trees, Budapest or Katowice?
Katowice, with roughly 118,929 trees inside its 2 km radius against 81,273. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Katowice has the denser canopy at 38.2%.
Which has better air quality, Budapest or Katowice?
Katowice right now, at AQI 30 against 57 — a gap of 27 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.
How many more trees does each city need?
Budapest needs about 2,514 more to reach its canopy target, and Katowice about 0. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.
Are these two measured the same way?
Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.
Keep going
Other comparisons nearby
- Budapest vs Székesfehérvár33% tree cover · AQI 30Compare
- Budapest vs Kecskemét18% tree cover · AQI 26Compare
- Budapest vs Győr33% tree cover · AQI 31Compare
- Budapest vs Nitra45% tree cover · AQI 57Compare
- Budapest vs Tychy68% tree cover · AQI 28Compare
- Budapest vs Dąbrowa Górnicza66% tree cover · AQI 28Compare
Build your own
Compare Budapest with somewhere else
This place
Budapest
Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.