Braunschweig vs Wrocław
Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.
Braunschweig has more tree cover — 44.6% against 37.6%.
Wrocław has cleaner air right now — AQI 49 against 74.
- Tree cover gap
- 7.0 points
- Braunschweig is ahead.
- Air quality gap
- 25 AQI
- Wrocław is cleaner.
- Trees between them
- 23.7K
- Braunschweig has more standing.
Germany
Poland
Tree cover
Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.
44.6%
37.6%
Air quality index
US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.
74 · Moderate
49 · Good
Trees standing
Estimated from the measured canopy area.
140K
116K
Trees still needed
To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.
0
0
CO₂ absorbed each year
By the trees already standing.
3.1M kg
2.6M kg
Air quality in detail
What each city is breathing
Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Both are read from nearby ground stations.
PM2.5
Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.
8 µg/m³
9.6 µg/m³
PM10
Coarser particles — dust, pollen, road grit.
25.8 µg/m³
31.7 µg/m³
Nitrogen dioxide
Mostly traffic and combustion.
13.5 µg/m³
4 µg/m³
Ozone
Forms in sunlight; peaks on hot, still afternoons.
123.4 µg/m³
105.6 µg/m³
The last week, day by day
A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.
Reading these numbers
What is actually being measured
Tree cover
The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Braunschweig leads here at 44.6%.
Air quality index
The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Braunschweig reads 74 (moderate) and Wrocław reads 49 (good) right now.
Frequently asked
Braunschweig and Wrocław, answered
Which has more trees, Braunschweig or Wrocław?
Braunschweig, with roughly 139,975 trees inside its 2 km radius against 116,234. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Braunschweig has the denser canopy at 44.6%.
Which has better air quality, Braunschweig or Wrocław?
Wrocław right now, at AQI 49 against 74 — a gap of 25 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.
How many more trees does each city need?
Braunschweig needs about 0 more to reach its canopy target, and Wrocław about 0. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.
Are these two measured the same way?
Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.
Keep going
Other comparisons nearby
- Braunschweig vs Salzgitter43% tree cover · AQI 64Compare
- Braunschweig vs Wolfsburg48% tree cover · AQI 80Compare
- Braunschweig vs Hildesheim59% tree cover · AQI 39Compare
- Braunschweig vs Hannover42% tree cover · AQI 44Compare
- Braunschweig vs Legnica65% tree cover · AQI 28Compare
- Braunschweig vs Wałbrzych80% tree cover · AQI 34Compare
Build your own
Compare Braunschweig with somewhere else
This place
Braunschweig
Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.