Boa Vista vs Cumaná
Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.
Boa Vista has more tree cover — 15.5% against 9.6%.
Cumaná has cleaner air right now — AQI 10 against 28.
- Tree cover gap
- 5.9 points
- Boa Vista is ahead.
- Air quality gap
- 18 AQI
- Cumaná is cleaner.
- Trees between them
- 17.0K
- Boa Vista has more standing.
Tree cover
Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.
15.5%
9.6%
Air quality index
US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.
28 · Good
10 · Good
Trees standing
Estimated from the measured canopy area.
42.8K
25.8K
Trees still needed
To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.
40.0K
54.7K
CO₂ absorbed each year
By the trees already standing.
941K kg
567K kg
Air quality in detail
What each city is breathing
Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Both are modelled, with no ground station close enough to either.
PM2.5
Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.
6.6 µg/m³
2.4 µg/m³
PM10
Coarser particles — dust, pollen, road grit.
7.2 µg/m³
2.6 µg/m³
Nitrogen dioxide
Mostly traffic and combustion.
2.9 µg/m³
4.6 µg/m³
Ozone
Forms in sunlight; peaks on hot, still afternoons.
22 µg/m³
12 µg/m³
The last week, day by day
A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.
| Day | Boa Vista | Cumaná |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Sept | 34 | 19 |
| 23 Sept | 37 | 19 |
| 24 Sept | 29 | 20 |
| 25 Sept | 33 | 20 |
| 26 Sept | 51 | 25 |
| 27 Sept | 44 | 18 |
| 28 Sept | 32 | 10 |
Reading these numbers
What is actually being measured
Tree cover
The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Boa Vista leads here at 15.5%.
Air quality index
The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Boa Vista reads 28 (good) and Cumaná reads 10 (good) right now.
Frequently asked
Boa Vista and Cumaná, answered
Which has more trees, Boa Vista or Cumaná?
Boa Vista, with roughly 42,754 trees inside its 2 km radius against 25,756. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Boa Vista has the denser canopy at 15.5%.
Which has better air quality, Boa Vista or Cumaná?
Cumaná right now, at AQI 10 against 28 — a gap of 18 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.
How many more trees does each city need?
Boa Vista needs about 39,996 more to reach its canopy target, and Cumaná about 54,732. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.
Are these two measured the same way?
Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.
Keep going
Other comparisons nearby
- Boa Vista vs Linden50% tree cover · AQI 22Compare
- Boa Vista vs New Amsterdam59% tree cover · AQI 32Compare
- Boa Vista vs Georgetown30% tree cover · AQI 34Compare
- Boa Vista vs Upata56% tree cover · AQI 10Compare
- Boa Vista vs Puerto La Cruz11% tree cover · AQI 25Compare
- Boa Vista vs Porlamar9% tree cover · AQI 19Compare
Build your own
Compare Boa Vista with somewhere else
This place
Boa Vista
Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.