Skip to content
Airleaf

Birnin Kebbi vs Kaduna

Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.

Kaduna has more tree cover — 30.8% against 25.1%.

Kaduna has cleaner air right now — AQI 35 against 67.

Tree cover gap
5.7 points
Kaduna is ahead.
Air quality gap
32 AQI
Kaduna is cleaner.
Trees between them
17.9K
Kaduna has more standing.
Kaduna

Nigeria

Tree cover

Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.

25.1%

30.8%

Air quality index

US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.

67 · Moderate

35 · Good

Trees standing

Estimated from the measured canopy area.

78.9K

96.8K

Trees still needed

To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.

15.4K

0

CO₂ absorbed each year

By the trees already standing.

1.7M kg

2.1M kg

Air quality in detail

What each city is breathing

Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Both are modelled, with no ground station close enough to either.

PM2.5

Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.

19.8 µg/m³

8.3 µg/m³

PM10

Coarser particles — dust, pollen, road grit.

27.2 µg/m³

9.5 µg/m³

Nitrogen dioxide

Mostly traffic and combustion.

5.6 µg/m³

4 µg/m³

Ozone

Forms in sunlight; peaks on hot, still afternoons.

36 µg/m³

54 µg/m³

The last week, day by day

A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.

Birnin KebbiKaduna· daily US EPA index, last 7 days
05010022 Sept25 Sept28 Sept
Daily air quality index for Birnin Kebbi and Kaduna
DayBirnin KebbiKaduna
22 Sept4756
23 Sept6547
24 Sept8870
25 Sept7373
26 Sept5965
27 Sept5959
28 Sept6554

Reading these numbers

What is actually being measured

Tree cover

The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Kaduna leads here at 30.8%.

Air quality index

The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Birnin Kebbi reads 67 (moderate) and Kaduna reads 35 (good) right now.

Frequently asked

Birnin Kebbi and Kaduna, answered

Which has more trees, Birnin Kebbi or Kaduna?

Kaduna, with roughly 96,761 trees inside its 2 km radius against 78,854. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Kaduna has the denser canopy at 30.8%.

Which has better air quality, Birnin Kebbi or Kaduna?

Kaduna right now, at AQI 35 against 67 — a gap of 32 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.

How many more trees does each city need?

Birnin Kebbi needs about 15,394 more to reach its canopy target, and Kaduna about 0. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.

Are these two measured the same way?

Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.

Keep going

Other comparisons nearby

Build your own

Compare Birnin Kebbi with somewhere else

This place

Birnin Kebbi

Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.