Bila Tserkva vs Ivano-Frankivsk
Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.
Bila Tserkva has more tree cover — 48.8% against 43.3%.
Bila Tserkva has cleaner air right now — AQI 33 against 45.
- Tree cover gap
- 5.5 points
- Bila Tserkva is ahead.
- Air quality gap
- 12 AQI
- Bila Tserkva is cleaner.
- Trees between them
- 16.9K
- Bila Tserkva has more standing.
Ukraine
Ukraine
Tree cover
Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.
48.8%
43.3%
Air quality index
US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.
33 · Good
45 · Good
Trees standing
Estimated from the measured canopy area.
150K
133K
Trees still needed
To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.
0
0
CO₂ absorbed each year
By the trees already standing.
3.3M kg
2.9M kg
Air quality in detail
What each city is breathing
Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Ivano-Frankivsk is read from nearby ground stations and Bila Tserkva is modelled — worth knowing, since the two are not quite like for like.
PM2.5
Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.
7.8 µg/m³
10.8 µg/m³
The last week, day by day
A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.
| Day | Bila Tserkva | Ivano-Frankivsk |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Sept | 21 | 23 |
| 23 Sept | 20 | 23 |
| 24 Sept | 22 | 28 |
| 25 Sept | 27 | 34 |
| 26 Sept | 29 | 47 |
| 27 Sept | 37 | 45 |
| 28 Sept | 37 | 61 |
Reading these numbers
What is actually being measured
Tree cover
The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Bila Tserkva leads here at 48.8%.
Air quality index
The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Bila Tserkva reads 33 (good) and Ivano-Frankivsk reads 45 (good) right now.
Frequently asked
Bila Tserkva and Ivano-Frankivsk, answered
Which has more trees, Bila Tserkva or Ivano-Frankivsk?
Bila Tserkva, with roughly 150,090 trees inside its 2 km radius against 133,174. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Bila Tserkva has the denser canopy at 48.8%.
Which has better air quality, Bila Tserkva or Ivano-Frankivsk?
Bila Tserkva right now, at AQI 33 against 45 — a gap of 12 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.
How many more trees does each city need?
Bila Tserkva needs about 0 more to reach its canopy target, and Ivano-Frankivsk about 0. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.
Are these two measured the same way?
Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.
Keep going
Other comparisons nearby
- Bila Tserkva vs Kyiv47% tree cover · AQI 41Compare
- Bila Tserkva vs Brovary60% tree cover · AQI 24Compare
- Bila Tserkva vs Zhytomyr46% tree cover · AQI 41Compare
- Bila Tserkva vs Vinnytsya56% tree cover · AQI 43Compare
- Bila Tserkva vs Ternopil43% tree cover · AQI 41Compare
- Bila Tserkva vs Lviv43% tree cover · AQI 49Compare
Build your own
Compare Bila Tserkva with somewhere else
This place
Bila Tserkva
Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.