Bielsko-Biala vs Vienna
Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.
Bielsko-Biala has more tree cover — 54.5% against 19.3%.
Bielsko-Biala has cleaner air right now — AQI 46 against 54.
- Tree cover gap
- 35.2 points
- Bielsko-Biala is ahead.
- Air quality gap
- 8 AQI
- Bielsko-Biala is cleaner.
- Trees between them
- 112K
- Bielsko-Biala has more standing.
Poland
Austria
Tree cover
Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.
54.5%
19.3%
Air quality index
US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.
46 · Good
54 · Moderate
Trees standing
Estimated from the measured canopy area.
171K
59.5K
Trees still needed
To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.
0
33.0K
CO₂ absorbed each year
By the trees already standing.
3.8M kg
1.3M kg
Air quality in detail
What each city is breathing
Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Both are read from nearby ground stations.
PM2.5
Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.
11 µg/m³
13.3 µg/m³
Nitrogen dioxide
Mostly traffic and combustion.
18.8 µg/m³
36.5 µg/m³
Ozone
Forms in sunlight; peaks on hot, still afternoons.
22 µg/m³
26.2 µg/m³
The last week, day by day
A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.
| Day | Bielsko-Biala | Vienna |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Sept | 31 | 29 |
| 23 Sept | 40 | 29 |
| 24 Sept | 42 | 35 |
| 25 Sept | 49 | 31 |
| 26 Sept | 51 | 37 |
| 27 Sept | 54 | 37 |
| 28 Sept | 54 | 42 |
Reading these numbers
What is actually being measured
Tree cover
The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Bielsko-Biala leads here at 54.5%.
Air quality index
The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Bielsko-Biala reads 46 (good) and Vienna reads 54 (moderate) right now.
Frequently asked
Bielsko-Biala and Vienna, answered
Which has more trees, Bielsko-Biala or Vienna?
Bielsko-Biala, with roughly 171,217 trees inside its 2 km radius against 59,481. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Bielsko-Biala has the denser canopy at 54.5%.
Which has better air quality, Bielsko-Biala or Vienna?
Bielsko-Biala right now, at AQI 46 against 54 — a gap of 8 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.
How many more trees does each city need?
Bielsko-Biala needs about 0 more to reach its canopy target, and Vienna about 32,976. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.
Are these two measured the same way?
Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.
Keep going
Other comparisons nearby
- Bielsko-Biala vs Tychy68% tree cover · AQI 70Compare
- Bielsko-Biala vs Rybnik61% tree cover · AQI 65Compare
- Bielsko-Biala vs Katowice38% tree cover · AQI 73Compare
- Bielsko-Biala vs Ruda Śląska74% tree cover · AQI 70Compare
- Bielsko-Biala vs Bratislava45% tree cover · AQI 34Compare
- Bielsko-Biala vs Győr33% tree cover · AQI 77Compare
Build your own
Compare Bielsko-Biala with somewhere else
This place
Bielsko-Biala
Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.