Skip to content
Airleaf

Bielsko-Biala vs Subotica

Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.

Bielsko-Biala has more tree cover — 54.5% against 24.9%.

Subotica has cleaner air right now — AQI 25 against 40.

Tree cover gap
29.6 points
Bielsko-Biala is ahead.
Air quality gap
15 AQI
Subotica is cleaner.
Trees between them
93.0K
Bielsko-Biala has more standing.

Tree cover

Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.

54.5%

24.9%

Air quality index

US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.

40 · Good

25 · Good

Trees standing

Estimated from the measured canopy area.

171K

78.2K

Trees still needed

To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.

0

16.0K

CO₂ absorbed each year

By the trees already standing.

3.8M kg

1.7M kg

Air quality in detail

What each city is breathing

Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Bielsko-Biala is read from nearby ground stations and Subotica is modelled — worth knowing, since the two are not quite like for like.

PM2.5

Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.

9.5 µg/m³

6.1 µg/m³

PM10

Coarser particles — dust, pollen, road grit.

13.2 µg/m³

8.3 µg/m³

Nitrogen dioxide

Mostly traffic and combustion.

13.5 µg/m³

1 µg/m³

Ozone

Forms in sunlight; peaks on hot, still afternoons.

35.5 µg/m³

76 µg/m³

The last week, day by day

A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.

Bielsko-BialaSubotica· daily US EPA index, last 7 days
0387522 Sept25 Sept28 Sept
Daily air quality index for Bielsko-Biala and Subotica
DayBielsko-BialaSubotica
22 Sept3130
23 Sept4025
24 Sept4227
25 Sept4931
26 Sept5134
27 Sept5433
28 Sept5428

Reading these numbers

What is actually being measured

Tree cover

The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Bielsko-Biala leads here at 54.5%.

Air quality index

The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Bielsko-Biala reads 40 (good) and Subotica reads 25 (good) right now.

Frequently asked

Bielsko-Biala and Subotica, answered

Which has more trees, Bielsko-Biala or Subotica?

Bielsko-Biala, with roughly 171,217 trees inside its 2 km radius against 78,226. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Bielsko-Biala has the denser canopy at 54.5%.

Which has better air quality, Bielsko-Biala or Subotica?

Subotica right now, at AQI 25 against 40 — a gap of 15 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.

How many more trees does each city need?

Bielsko-Biala needs about 0 more to reach its canopy target, and Subotica about 16,022. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.

Are these two measured the same way?

Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.

Keep going

Other comparisons nearby

Build your own

Compare Bielsko-Biala with somewhere else

This place

Bielsko-Biala

Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.