Skip to content
Airleaf

Bielsko-Biala vs Dąbrowa Górnicza

Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.

Dąbrowa Górnicza has more tree cover — 66.1% against 54.5%.

Bielsko-Biala has cleaner air right now — AQI 58 against 86.

Tree cover gap
11.6 points
Dąbrowa Górnicza is ahead.
Air quality gap
28 AQI
Bielsko-Biala is cleaner.
Trees between them
24.6K
Dąbrowa Górnicza has more standing.

Tree cover

Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.

54.5%

66.1%

Air quality index

US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.

58 · Moderate

86 · Moderate

Trees standing

Estimated from the measured canopy area.

171K

196K

Trees still needed

To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.

0

0

CO₂ absorbed each year

By the trees already standing.

3.8M kg

4.3M kg

Air quality in detail

What each city is breathing

Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Both are read from nearby ground stations.

PM2.5

Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.

15.5 µg/m³

28.6 µg/m³

Nitrogen dioxide

Mostly traffic and combustion.

6 µg/m³

12.3 µg/m³

Ozone

Forms in sunlight; peaks on hot, still afternoons.

31.5 µg/m³

17.2 µg/m³

The last week, day by day

A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.

Bielsko-BialaDąbrowa Górnicza· daily US EPA index, last 7 days
05010022 Sept25 Sept28 Sept
Daily air quality index for Bielsko-Biala and Dąbrowa Górnicza
DayBielsko-BialaDąbrowa Górnicza
22 Sept3125
23 Sept4034
24 Sept4260
25 Sept4954
26 Sept5180
27 Sept5474
28 Sept5972

Reading these numbers

What is actually being measured

Tree cover

The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Dąbrowa Górnicza leads here at 66.1%.

Air quality index

The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Bielsko-Biala reads 58 (moderate) and Dąbrowa Górnicza reads 86 (moderate) right now.

Frequently asked

Bielsko-Biala and Dąbrowa Górnicza, answered

Which has more trees, Bielsko-Biala or Dąbrowa Górnicza?

Dąbrowa Górnicza, with roughly 195,823 trees inside its 2 km radius against 171,217. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Dąbrowa Górnicza has the denser canopy at 66.1%.

Which has better air quality, Bielsko-Biala or Dąbrowa Górnicza?

Bielsko-Biala right now, at AQI 58 against 86 — a gap of 28 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.

How many more trees does each city need?

Bielsko-Biala needs about 0 more to reach its canopy target, and Dąbrowa Górnicza about 0. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.

Are these two measured the same way?

Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.

Keep going

Other comparisons nearby

Build your own

Compare Bielsko-Biala with somewhere else

This place

Bielsko-Biala

Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.