Bielefeld vs Legnica
Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.
Legnica has more tree cover — 64.5% against 51.6%.
Legnica has cleaner air right now — AQI 28 against 81.
- Tree cover gap
- 12.9 points
- Legnica is ahead.
- Air quality gap
- 53 AQI
- Legnica is cleaner.
- Trees between them
- 40.7K
- Legnica has more standing.
Tree cover
Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.
51.6%
64.5%
Air quality index
US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.
81 · Moderate
28 · Good
Trees standing
Estimated from the measured canopy area.
162K
203K
Trees still needed
To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.
0
0
CO₂ absorbed each year
By the trees already standing.
3.6M kg
4.5M kg
Air quality in detail
What each city is breathing
Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Bielefeld is read from nearby ground stations and Legnica is modelled — worth knowing, since the two are not quite like for like.
PM2.5
Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.
26.6 µg/m³
6.4 µg/m³
PM10
Coarser particles — dust, pollen, road grit.
19.8 µg/m³
8.3 µg/m³
Nitrogen dioxide
Mostly traffic and combustion.
42.7 µg/m³
1.7 µg/m³
The last week, day by day
A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.
| Day | Bielefeld | Legnica |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Sept | 28 | 26 |
| 23 Sept | 47 | 26 |
| 24 Sept | 32 | 30 |
| 25 Sept | 36 | 32 |
| 26 Sept | 49 | 49 |
| 27 Sept | 45 | 55 |
| 28 Sept | 43 | 46 |
Reading these numbers
What is actually being measured
Tree cover
The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Legnica leads here at 64.5%.
Air quality index
The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Bielefeld reads 81 (moderate) and Legnica reads 28 (good) right now.
Frequently asked
Bielefeld and Legnica, answered
Which has more trees, Bielefeld or Legnica?
Legnica, with roughly 202,633 trees inside its 2 km radius against 161,944. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Legnica has the denser canopy at 64.5%.
Which has better air quality, Bielefeld or Legnica?
Legnica right now, at AQI 28 against 81 — a gap of 53 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.
How many more trees does each city need?
Bielefeld needs about 0 more to reach its canopy target, and Legnica about 0. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.
Are these two measured the same way?
Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.
Keep going
Other comparisons nearby
- Bielefeld vs Paderborn57% tree cover · AQI 23Compare
- Bielefeld vs Osnabrück51% tree cover · AQI 55Compare
- Bielefeld vs Münster54% tree cover · AQI 59Compare
- Bielefeld vs Hamm60% tree cover · AQI 56Compare
- Bielefeld vs Wałbrzych80% tree cover · AQI 34Compare
- Bielefeld vs Wrocław38% tree cover · AQI 47Compare
Build your own
Compare Bielefeld with somewhere else
This place
Bielefeld
Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.