Bharatpur vs Kushinagar
Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.
Bharatpur has more tree cover — 52.2% against 40.7%.
Bharatpur has cleaner air right now — AQI 56 against 134.
- Tree cover gap
- 11.5 points
- Bharatpur is ahead.
- Air quality gap
- 78 AQI
- Bharatpur is cleaner.
- Trees between them
- 36.1K
- Bharatpur has more standing.
Nepal
India
Tree cover
Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.
52.2%
40.7%
Air quality index
US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.
56 · Moderate
134 · Unhealthy for sensitive groups
Trees standing
Estimated from the measured canopy area.
164K
128K
Trees still needed
To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.
0
0
CO₂ absorbed each year
By the trees already standing.
3.6M kg
2.8M kg
Air quality in detail
What each city is breathing
Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Bharatpur is read from nearby ground stations and Kushinagar is modelled — worth knowing, since the two are not quite like for like.
PM2.5
Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.
14.4 µg/m³
48.8 µg/m³
The last week, day by day
A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.
| Day | Bharatpur | Kushinagar |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Sept | 80 | 123 |
| 23 Sept | 67 | 78 |
| 24 Sept | 60 | 50 |
| 25 Sept | 63 | 44 |
| 26 Sept | 53 | 47 |
| 27 Sept | 44 | 93 |
| 28 Sept | 74 | 155 |
Reading these numbers
What is actually being measured
Tree cover
The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Bharatpur leads here at 52.2%.
Air quality index
The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Bharatpur reads 56 (moderate) and Kushinagar reads 134 (unhealthy for sensitive groups) right now.
Frequently asked
Bharatpur and Kushinagar, answered
Which has more trees, Bharatpur or Kushinagar?
Bharatpur, with roughly 163,991 trees inside its 2 km radius against 127,863. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Bharatpur has the denser canopy at 52.2%.
Which has better air quality, Bharatpur or Kushinagar?
Bharatpur right now, at AQI 56 against 134 — a gap of 78 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.
How many more trees does each city need?
Bharatpur needs about 0 more to reach its canopy target, and Kushinagar about 0. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.
Are these two measured the same way?
Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.
Keep going
Other comparisons nearby
- Bharatpur vs Hetauda67% tree cover · AQI 87Compare
- Bharatpur vs Bagaha67% tree cover · AQI 159Compare
- Bharatpur vs Pokhara80% tree cover · AQI 71Compare
- Bharatpur vs Birgañj41% tree cover · AQI 92Compare
- Bharatpur vs Deoria21% tree cover · AQI 108Compare
- Bharatpur vs Gorakhpur14% tree cover · AQI 100Compare
Build your own
Compare Bharatpur with somewhere else
This place
Bharatpur
Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.