Bergisch Gladbach vs Moers
Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.
Bergisch Gladbach has more tree cover — 72.5% against 57.0%.
Bergisch Gladbach has cleaner air right now — AQI 35 against 64.
- Tree cover gap
- 15.5 points
- Bergisch Gladbach is ahead.
- Air quality gap
- 29 AQI
- Bergisch Gladbach is cleaner.
- Trees between them
- 48.7K
- Bergisch Gladbach has more standing.
Germany
Germany
Tree cover
Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.
72.5%
57.0%
Air quality index
US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.
35 · Good
64 · Moderate
Trees standing
Estimated from the measured canopy area.
228K
179K
Trees still needed
To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.
0
0
CO₂ absorbed each year
By the trees already standing.
5.0M kg
3.9M kg
Air quality in detail
What each city is breathing
Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Both are read from nearby ground stations.
PM2.5
Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.
8.5 µg/m³
18.2 µg/m³
The last week, day by day
A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.
| Day | Bergisch Gladbach | Moers |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Sept | 43 | 42 |
| 23 Sept | 40 | 56 |
| 24 Sept | 38 | 32 |
| 25 Sept | 39 | 50 |
| 26 Sept | 37 | 56 |
| 27 Sept | 41 | 57 |
| 28 Sept | 36 | 48 |
Reading these numbers
What is actually being measured
Tree cover
The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Bergisch Gladbach leads here at 72.5%.
Air quality index
The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Bergisch Gladbach reads 35 (good) and Moers reads 64 (moderate) right now.
Frequently asked
Bergisch Gladbach and Moers, answered
Which has more trees, Bergisch Gladbach or Moers?
Bergisch Gladbach, with roughly 227,765 trees inside its 2 km radius against 179,071. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Bergisch Gladbach has the denser canopy at 72.5%.
Which has better air quality, Bergisch Gladbach or Moers?
Bergisch Gladbach right now, at AQI 35 against 64 — a gap of 29 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.
How many more trees does each city need?
Bergisch Gladbach needs about 0 more to reach its canopy target, and Moers about 0. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.
Are these two measured the same way?
Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.
Keep going
Other comparisons nearby
- Bergisch Gladbach vs Köln27% tree cover · AQI 35Compare
- Bergisch Gladbach vs Solingen65% tree cover · AQI 54Compare
- Bergisch Gladbach vs Bonn52% tree cover · AQI 36Compare
- Bergisch Gladbach vs Wuppertal59% tree cover · AQI 43Compare
- Bergisch Gladbach vs Krefeld56% tree cover · AQI 54Compare
- Bergisch Gladbach vs Oberhausen50% tree cover · AQI 45Compare
Build your own
Compare Bergisch Gladbach with somewhere else
This place
Bergisch Gladbach
Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.