Beirut vs Petaẖ Tiqva
Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.
Petaẖ Tiqva has more tree cover — 13.5% against 9.8%.
Petaẖ Tiqva has cleaner air right now — AQI 13 against 32.
- Tree cover gap
- 3.7 points
- Petaẖ Tiqva is ahead.
- Air quality gap
- 19 AQI
- Petaẖ Tiqva is cleaner.
- Trees between them
- 16.7K
- Petaẖ Tiqva has more standing.
Lebanon
Israel
Tree cover
Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.
9.8%
13.5%
Air quality index
US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.
32 · Good
13 · Good
Trees standing
Estimated from the measured canopy area.
25.7K
42.4K
Trees still needed
To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.
52.9K
51.8K
CO₂ absorbed each year
By the trees already standing.
565K kg
933K kg
Air quality in detail
What each city is breathing
Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Both are read from nearby ground stations.
PM2.5
Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.
7.6 µg/m³
3.2 µg/m³
The last week, day by day
A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.
| Day | Beirut | Petaẖ Tiqva |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Sept | 72 | 44 |
| 23 Sept | 53 | 47 |
| 24 Sept | 55 | 45 |
| 25 Sept | 69 | 39 |
| 26 Sept | 74 | 35 |
| 27 Sept | 56 | 42 |
| 28 Sept | 49 | 51 |
Reading these numbers
What is actually being measured
Tree cover
The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Petaẖ Tiqva leads here at 13.5%.
Air quality index
The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Beirut reads 32 (good) and Petaẖ Tiqva reads 13 (good) right now.
Frequently asked
Beirut and Petaẖ Tiqva, answered
Which has more trees, Beirut or Petaẖ Tiqva?
Petaẖ Tiqva, with roughly 42,412 trees inside its 2 km radius against 25,677. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Petaẖ Tiqva has the denser canopy at 13.5%.
Which has better air quality, Beirut or Petaẖ Tiqva?
Petaẖ Tiqva right now, at AQI 13 against 32 — a gap of 19 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.
How many more trees does each city need?
Beirut needs about 52,926 more to reach its canopy target, and Petaẖ Tiqva about 51,836. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.
Are these two measured the same way?
Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.
Keep going
Other comparisons nearby
Build your own
Compare Beirut with somewhere else
This place
Beirut
Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.