Skip to content
Airleaf

Beira vs Krugersdorp

Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.

Krugersdorp has more tree cover — 32.5% against 8.2%.

Beira has cleaner air right now — AQI 60 against 76.

Tree cover gap
24.3 points
Krugersdorp is ahead.
Air quality gap
16 AQI
Beira is cleaner.
Trees between them
90.0K
Krugersdorp has more standing.
Beira

Mozambique

Krugersdorp

South Africa

Tree cover

Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.

8.2%

32.5%

Air quality index

US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.

60 · Moderate

76 · Moderate

Trees standing

Estimated from the measured canopy area.

11.9K

102K

Trees still needed

To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.

31.7K

0

CO₂ absorbed each year

By the trees already standing.

262K kg

2.2M kg

Air quality in detail

What each city is breathing

Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Krugersdorp is read from nearby ground stations and Beira is modelled — worth knowing, since the two are not quite like for like.

PM2.5

Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.

16.3 µg/m³

24.1 µg/m³

The last week, day by day

A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.

BeiraKrugersdorp· daily US EPA index, last 7 days
05010022 Sept25 Sept28 Sept
Daily air quality index for Beira and Krugersdorp
DayBeiraKrugersdorp
22 Sept5487
23 Sept4057
24 Sept4079
25 Sept3984
26 Sept5361
27 Sept5556
28 Sept5062

Reading these numbers

What is actually being measured

Tree cover

The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Krugersdorp leads here at 32.5%.

Air quality index

The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Beira reads 60 (moderate) and Krugersdorp reads 76 (moderate) right now.

Frequently asked

Beira and Krugersdorp, answered

Which has more trees, Beira or Krugersdorp?

Krugersdorp, with roughly 101,898 trees inside its 2 km radius against 11,927. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Krugersdorp has the denser canopy at 32.5%.

Which has better air quality, Beira or Krugersdorp?

Beira right now, at AQI 60 against 76 — a gap of 16 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.

How many more trees does each city need?

Beira needs about 31,709 more to reach its canopy target, and Krugersdorp about 0. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.

Are these two measured the same way?

Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.

Keep going

Other comparisons nearby

Build your own

Compare Beira with somewhere else

This place

Beira

Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.