Skip to content
Airleaf

Bégoua vs Katabi

Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.

Bégoua has more tree cover — 52.2% against 42.8%.

Bégoua has cleaner air right now — AQI 26 against 39.

Tree cover gap
9.4 points
Bégoua is ahead.
Air quality gap
13 AQI
Bégoua is cleaner.
Trees between them
37.6K
Bégoua has more standing.
Bégoua

Central African Republic

Katabi

Uganda

Tree cover

Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.

52.2%

42.8%

Air quality index

US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.

26 · Good

39 · Good

Trees standing

Estimated from the measured canopy area.

164K

126K

Trees still needed

To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.

0

0

CO₂ absorbed each year

By the trees already standing.

3.6M kg

2.8M kg

Air quality in detail

What each city is breathing

Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Both are modelled, with no ground station close enough to either.

PM2.5

Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.

6.3 µg/m³

9.4 µg/m³

PM10

Coarser particles — dust, pollen, road grit.

6.6 µg/m³

9.8 µg/m³

Nitrogen dioxide

Mostly traffic and combustion.

2 µg/m³

2.8 µg/m³

Ozone

Forms in sunlight; peaks on hot, still afternoons.

20 µg/m³

73 µg/m³

The last week, day by day

A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.

BégouaKatabi· daily US EPA index, last 7 days
0387523 Sept26 Sept29 Sept
Daily air quality index for Bégoua and Katabi
DayBégouaKatabi
23 Sept5066
24 Sept3066
25 Sept3961
26 Sept3174
27 Sept3753
28 Sept3054
29 Sept2747

Reading these numbers

What is actually being measured

Tree cover

The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Bégoua leads here at 52.2%.

Air quality index

The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Bégoua reads 26 (good) and Katabi reads 39 (good) right now.

Frequently asked

Bégoua and Katabi, answered

Which has more trees, Bégoua or Katabi?

Bégoua, with roughly 163,991 trees inside its 2 km radius against 126,393. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Bégoua has the denser canopy at 52.2%.

Which has better air quality, Bégoua or Katabi?

Bégoua right now, at AQI 26 against 39 — a gap of 13 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.

How many more trees does each city need?

Bégoua needs about 0 more to reach its canopy target, and Katabi about 0. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.

Are these two measured the same way?

Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.

Keep going

Other comparisons nearby

Build your own

Compare Bégoua with somewhere else

This place

Bégoua

Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.