Bayamo vs Ciego de Ávila
Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.
Bayamo has more tree cover — 50.5% against 39.5%.
Ciego de Ávila has cleaner air right now — AQI 23 against 45.
- Tree cover gap
- 11.0 points
- Bayamo is ahead.
- Air quality gap
- 22 AQI
- Ciego de Ávila is cleaner.
- Trees between them
- 34.6K
- Bayamo has more standing.
Cuba
Cuba
Tree cover
Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.
50.5%
39.5%
Air quality index
US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.
45 · Good
23 · Good
Trees standing
Estimated from the measured canopy area.
159K
124K
Trees still needed
To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.
0
0
CO₂ absorbed each year
By the trees already standing.
3.5M kg
2.7M kg
Air quality in detail
What each city is breathing
Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Both are modelled, with no ground station close enough to either.
PM2.5
Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.
10.9 µg/m³
5.6 µg/m³
PM10
Coarser particles — dust, pollen, road grit.
15.1 µg/m³
6.7 µg/m³
Nitrogen dioxide
Mostly traffic and combustion.
7.8 µg/m³
7.1 µg/m³
Ozone
Forms in sunlight; peaks on hot, still afternoons.
16 µg/m³
25 µg/m³
The last week, day by day
A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.
| Day | Bayamo | Ciego de Ávila |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Sept | 32 | 21 |
| 23 Sept | 40 | 24 |
| 24 Sept | 41 | 34 |
| 25 Sept | 27 | 29 |
| 26 Sept | 30 | 20 |
| 27 Sept | 41 | 29 |
| 28 Sept | 45 | 23 |
Reading these numbers
What is actually being measured
Tree cover
The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Bayamo leads here at 50.5%.
Air quality index
The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Bayamo reads 45 (good) and Ciego de Ávila reads 23 (good) right now.
Frequently asked
Bayamo and Ciego de Ávila, answered
Which has more trees, Bayamo or Ciego de Ávila?
Bayamo, with roughly 158,650 trees inside its 2 km radius against 124,093. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Bayamo has the denser canopy at 50.5%.
Which has better air quality, Bayamo or Ciego de Ávila?
Ciego de Ávila right now, at AQI 23 against 45 — a gap of 22 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.
How many more trees does each city need?
Bayamo needs about 0 more to reach its canopy target, and Ciego de Ávila about 0. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.
Are these two measured the same way?
Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.
Keep going
Other comparisons nearby
- Bayamo vs Manzanillo54% tree cover · AQI 55Compare
- Bayamo vs Holguín27% tree cover · AQI 43Compare
- Bayamo vs Palma Soriano69% tree cover · AQI 56Compare
- Bayamo vs Las Tunas42% tree cover · AQI 41Compare
- Bayamo vs Sancti Spíritus58% tree cover · AQI 34Compare
- Bayamo vs Camagüey32% tree cover · AQI 39Compare
Build your own
Compare Bayamo with somewhere else
This place
Bayamo
Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.