Başakşehir vs Piteşti
Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.
Piteşti has more tree cover — 45.2% against 18.6%.
Piteşti has cleaner air right now — AQI 29 against 132.
- Tree cover gap
- 26.6 points
- Piteşti is ahead.
- Air quality gap
- 103 AQI
- Piteşti is cleaner.
- Trees between them
- 83.1K
- Piteşti has more standing.
Turkey
Romania
Tree cover
Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.
18.6%
45.2%
Air quality index
US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.
132 · Unhealthy for sensitive groups
29 · Good
Trees standing
Estimated from the measured canopy area.
58.4K
141K
Trees still needed
To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.
51.5K
0
CO₂ absorbed each year
By the trees already standing.
1.3M kg
3.1M kg
Air quality in detail
What each city is breathing
Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Başakşehir is read from nearby ground stations and Piteşti is modelled — worth knowing, since the two are not quite like for like.
PM2.5
Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.
48 µg/m³
4.8 µg/m³
PM10
Coarser particles — dust, pollen, road grit.
60.3 µg/m³
5.5 µg/m³
The last week, day by day
A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.
| Day | Başakşehir | Piteşti |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Sept | 34 | 28 |
| 23 Sept | 30 | 23 |
| 24 Sept | 28 | 26 |
| 25 Sept | 41 | 35 |
| 26 Sept | 33 | 31 |
| 27 Sept | 36 | 31 |
| 28 Sept | 33 | 29 |
Reading these numbers
What is actually being measured
Tree cover
The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Piteşti leads here at 45.2%.
Air quality index
The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Başakşehir reads 132 (unhealthy for sensitive groups) and Piteşti reads 29 (good) right now.
Frequently asked
Başakşehir and Piteşti, answered
Which has more trees, Başakşehir or Piteşti?
Piteşti, with roughly 141,432 trees inside its 2 km radius against 58,375. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Piteşti has the denser canopy at 45.2%.
Which has better air quality, Başakşehir or Piteşti?
Piteşti right now, at AQI 29 against 132 — a gap of 103 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.
How many more trees does each city need?
Başakşehir needs about 51,471 more to reach its canopy target, and Piteşti about 0. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.
Are these two measured the same way?
Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.
Keep going
Other comparisons nearby
- Başakşehir vs Küçükçekmece17% tree cover · AQI 74Compare
- Başakşehir vs Esenyurt6% tree cover · AQI 32Compare
- Başakşehir vs Istanbul11% tree cover · AQI 78Compare
- Başakşehir vs Umraniye19% tree cover · AQI 82Compare
- Başakşehir vs Ploieşti35% tree cover · AQI 31Compare
- Başakşehir vs Craiova29% tree cover · AQI 48Compare
Build your own
Compare Başakşehir with somewhere else
This place
Başakşehir
Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.