Skip to content
Airleaf

Baranovichi vs Wrocław

Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.

Baranovichi has more tree cover — 55.9% against 37.6%.

Baranovichi has cleaner air right now — AQI 30 against 70.

Tree cover gap
18.3 points
Baranovichi is ahead.
Air quality gap
40 AQI
Baranovichi is cleaner.
Trees between them
59.0K
Baranovichi has more standing.
Wrocław

Poland

Tree cover

Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.

55.9%

37.6%

Air quality index

US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.

30 · Good

70 · Moderate

Trees standing

Estimated from the measured canopy area.

175K

116K

Trees still needed

To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.

0

0

CO₂ absorbed each year

By the trees already standing.

3.9M kg

2.6M kg

Air quality in detail

What each city is breathing

Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Wrocław is read from nearby ground stations and Baranovichi is modelled — worth knowing, since the two are not quite like for like.

PM2.5

Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.

7.3 µg/m³

21.2 µg/m³

PM10

Coarser particles — dust, pollen, road grit.

10.3 µg/m³

33.2 µg/m³

Nitrogen dioxide

Mostly traffic and combustion.

1.7 µg/m³

13.3 µg/m³

Ozone

Forms in sunlight; peaks on hot, still afternoons.

68 µg/m³

31.8 µg/m³

The last week, day by day

A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.

BaranovichiWrocław· daily US EPA index, last 7 days
05010022 Sept25 Sept28 Sept
Daily air quality index for Baranovichi and Wrocław
DayBaranovichiWrocław
22 Sept1925
23 Sept2230
24 Sept2239
25 Sept2738
26 Sept3363
27 Sept4067
28 Sept4280

Reading these numbers

What is actually being measured

Tree cover

The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Baranovichi leads here at 55.9%.

Air quality index

The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Baranovichi reads 30 (good) and Wrocław reads 70 (moderate) right now.

Frequently asked

Baranovichi and Wrocław, answered

Which has more trees, Baranovichi or Wrocław?

Baranovichi, with roughly 175,264 trees inside its 2 km radius against 116,234. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Baranovichi has the denser canopy at 55.9%.

Which has better air quality, Baranovichi or Wrocław?

Baranovichi right now, at AQI 30 against 70 — a gap of 40 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.

How many more trees does each city need?

Baranovichi needs about 0 more to reach its canopy target, and Wrocław about 0. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.

Are these two measured the same way?

Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.

Keep going

Other comparisons nearby

Build your own

Compare Baranovichi with somewhere else

This place

Baranovichi

Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.