Skip to content
Airleaf

Baranovichi vs Białystok

Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.

Baranovichi has more tree cover — 55.9% against 44.1%.

Baranovichi has cleaner air right now — AQI 43 against 60.

Tree cover gap
11.8 points
Baranovichi is ahead.
Air quality gap
17 AQI
Baranovichi is cleaner.
Trees between them
36.9K
Baranovichi has more standing.

Tree cover

Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.

55.9%

44.1%

Air quality index

US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.

43 · Good

60 · Moderate

Trees standing

Estimated from the measured canopy area.

175K

138K

Trees still needed

To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.

0

0

CO₂ absorbed each year

By the trees already standing.

3.9M kg

3.0M kg

Air quality in detail

What each city is breathing

Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Białystok is read from nearby ground stations and Baranovichi is modelled — worth knowing, since the two are not quite like for like.

PM2.5

Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.

10.3 µg/m³

16.4 µg/m³

PM10

Coarser particles — dust, pollen, road grit.

12.8 µg/m³

20.9 µg/m³

Nitrogen dioxide

Mostly traffic and combustion.

4.1 µg/m³

14.4 µg/m³

Ozone

Forms in sunlight; peaks on hot, still afternoons.

45 µg/m³

6 µg/m³

The last week, day by day

A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.

BaranovichiBiałystok· daily US EPA index, last 7 days
0387522 Sept25 Sept28 Sept
Daily air quality index for Baranovichi and Białystok
DayBaranovichiBiałystok
22 Sept1921
23 Sept2226
24 Sept2229
25 Sept2730
26 Sept3345
27 Sept4060
28 Sept4450

Reading these numbers

What is actually being measured

Tree cover

The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Baranovichi leads here at 55.9%.

Air quality index

The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Baranovichi reads 43 (good) and Białystok reads 60 (moderate) right now.

Frequently asked

Baranovichi and Białystok, answered

Which has more trees, Baranovichi or Białystok?

Baranovichi, with roughly 175,264 trees inside its 2 km radius against 138,406. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Baranovichi has the denser canopy at 55.9%.

Which has better air quality, Baranovichi or Białystok?

Baranovichi right now, at AQI 43 against 60 — a gap of 17 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.

How many more trees does each city need?

Baranovichi needs about 0 more to reach its canopy target, and Białystok about 0. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.

Are these two measured the same way?

Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.

Keep going

Other comparisons nearby

Build your own

Compare Baranovichi with somewhere else

This place

Baranovichi

Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.