Skip to content
Airleaf

Banja Luka vs Székesfehérvár

Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.

Székesfehérvár has more tree cover — 33.1% against 29.8%.

Székesfehérvár has cleaner air right now — AQI 30 against 80.

Tree cover gap
3.3 points
Székesfehérvár is ahead.
Air quality gap
50 AQI
Székesfehérvár is cleaner.
Trees between them
9.7K
Székesfehérvár has more standing.
Banja Luka

Bosnia and Herzegovina

Tree cover

Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.

29.8%

33.1%

Air quality index

US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.

80 · Moderate

30 · Good

Trees standing

Estimated from the measured canopy area.

93.4K

103K

Trees still needed

To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.

627

0

CO₂ absorbed each year

By the trees already standing.

2.1M kg

2.3M kg

Air quality in detail

What each city is breathing

Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Banja Luka is read from nearby ground stations and Székesfehérvár is modelled — worth knowing, since the two are not quite like for like.

PM2.5

Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.

25.9 µg/m³

7.2 µg/m³

PM10

Coarser particles — dust, pollen, road grit.

41.3 µg/m³

10.1 µg/m³

Nitrogen dioxide

Mostly traffic and combustion.

40.6 µg/m³

3.7 µg/m³

Ozone

Forms in sunlight; peaks on hot, still afternoons.

5.3 µg/m³

57 µg/m³

The last week, day by day

A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.

Banja LukaSzékesfehérvár· daily US EPA index, last 7 days
05010022 Sept25 Sept28 Sept
Daily air quality index for Banja Luka and Székesfehérvár
DayBanja LukaSzékesfehérvár
22 Sept3129
23 Sept3426
24 Sept3227
25 Sept3428
26 Sept5133
27 Sept8045
28 Sept9646

Reading these numbers

What is actually being measured

Tree cover

The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Székesfehérvár leads here at 33.1%.

Air quality index

The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Banja Luka reads 80 (moderate) and Székesfehérvár reads 30 (good) right now.

Frequently asked

Banja Luka and Székesfehérvár, answered

Which has more trees, Banja Luka or Székesfehérvár?

Székesfehérvár, with roughly 103,155 trees inside its 2 km radius against 93,432. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Székesfehérvár has the denser canopy at 33.1%.

Which has better air quality, Banja Luka or Székesfehérvár?

Székesfehérvár right now, at AQI 30 against 80 — a gap of 50 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.

How many more trees does each city need?

Banja Luka needs about 627 more to reach its canopy target, and Székesfehérvár about 0. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.

Are these two measured the same way?

Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.

Keep going

Other comparisons nearby

Build your own

Compare Banja Luka with somewhere else

This place

Banja Luka

Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.