Bang Khae vs Latkrabang
Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.
Latkrabang has more tree cover — 42.8% against 31.5%.
Latkrabang has cleaner air right now — AQI 12 against 33.
- Tree cover gap
- 11.3 points
- Latkrabang is ahead.
- Air quality gap
- 21 AQI
- Latkrabang is cleaner.
- Trees between them
- 35.5K
- Latkrabang has more standing.
Thailand
Thailand
Tree cover
Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.
31.5%
42.8%
Air quality index
US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.
33 · Good
12 · Good
Trees standing
Estimated from the measured canopy area.
99.0K
134K
Trees still needed
To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.
0
0
CO₂ absorbed each year
By the trees already standing.
2.2M kg
3.0M kg
Air quality in detail
What each city is breathing
Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Both are read from nearby ground stations.
PM2.5
Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.
7.8 µg/m³
2.8 µg/m³
The last week, day by day
A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.
| Day | Bang Khae | Latkrabang |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Sept | 66 | 86 |
| 23 Sept | 92 | 100 |
| 24 Sept | 68 | 76 |
| 25 Sept | 28 | 38 |
| 26 Sept | 20 | 18 |
| 27 Sept | 21 | 18 |
| 28 Sept | 26 | 25 |
Reading these numbers
What is actually being measured
Tree cover
The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Latkrabang leads here at 42.8%.
Air quality index
The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Bang Khae reads 33 (good) and Latkrabang reads 12 (good) right now.
Frequently asked
Bang Khae and Latkrabang, answered
Which has more trees, Bang Khae or Latkrabang?
Latkrabang, with roughly 134,460 trees inside its 2 km radius against 98,960. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Latkrabang has the denser canopy at 42.8%.
Which has better air quality, Bang Khae or Latkrabang?
Latkrabang right now, at AQI 12 against 33 — a gap of 21 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.
How many more trees does each city need?
Bang Khae needs about 0 more to reach its canopy target, and Latkrabang about 0. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.
Are these two measured the same way?
Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.
Keep going
Other comparisons nearby
- Bang Khae vs Bangkok11% tree cover · AQI 30Compare
- Bang Khae vs Phra Pradaeng28% tree cover · AQI 13Compare
- Bang Khae vs Watthana22% tree cover · AQI 10Compare
- Bang Khae vs Mueang Nonthaburi31% tree cover · AQI 13Compare
- Bang Khae vs Khlong Sam Wa66% tree cover · AQI 9Compare
- Bang Khae vs Nong Chok62% tree cover · AQI 20Compare
Build your own
Compare Bang Khae with somewhere else
This place
Bang Khae
Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.