Banfora vs Bouaké
Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.
Banfora has more tree cover — 25.9% against 21.8%.
Bouaké has cleaner air right now — AQI 16 against 42.
- Tree cover gap
- 4.1 points
- Banfora is ahead.
- Air quality gap
- 26 AQI
- Bouaké is cleaner.
- Trees between them
- 12.9K
- Banfora has more standing.
Tree cover
Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.
25.9%
21.8%
Air quality index
US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.
42 · Good
16 · Good
Trees standing
Estimated from the measured canopy area.
81.4K
68.5K
Trees still needed
To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.
12.9K
25.8K
CO₂ absorbed each year
By the trees already standing.
1.8M kg
1.5M kg
Air quality in detail
What each city is breathing
Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Both are modelled, with no ground station close enough to either.
PM2.5
Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.
10 µg/m³
1.5 µg/m³
PM10
Coarser particles — dust, pollen, road grit.
14.2 µg/m³
2.1 µg/m³
Nitrogen dioxide
Mostly traffic and combustion.
2.4 µg/m³
0.4 µg/m³
Ozone
Forms in sunlight; peaks on hot, still afternoons.
40 µg/m³
49 µg/m³
The last week, day by day
A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.
| Day | Banfora | Bouaké |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Sept | 31 | 21 |
| 23 Sept | 32 | 16 |
| 24 Sept | 21 | 21 |
| 25 Sept | 22 | 27 |
| 26 Sept | 28 | 26 |
| 27 Sept | 50 | 29 |
| 28 Sept | 47 | 15 |
Reading these numbers
What is actually being measured
Tree cover
The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Banfora leads here at 25.9%.
Air quality index
The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Banfora reads 42 (good) and Bouaké reads 16 (good) right now.
Frequently asked
Banfora and Bouaké, answered
Which has more trees, Banfora or Bouaké?
Banfora, with roughly 81,367 trees inside its 2 km radius against 68,487. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Banfora has the denser canopy at 25.9%.
Which has better air quality, Banfora or Bouaké?
Bouaké right now, at AQI 16 against 42 — a gap of 26 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.
How many more trees does each city need?
Banfora needs about 12,881 more to reach its canopy target, and Bouaké about 25,761. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.
Are these two measured the same way?
Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.
Keep going
Other comparisons nearby
- Banfora vs Bobo-Dioulasso19% tree cover · AQI 47Compare
- Banfora vs Sikasso29% tree cover · AQI 29Compare
- Banfora vs Korhogo18% tree cover · AQI 19Compare
- Banfora vs Koutiala33% tree cover · AQI 50Compare
- Banfora vs Yamoussoukro38% tree cover · AQI 17Compare
- Banfora vs Bouaflé31% tree cover · AQI 16Compare
Build your own
Compare Banfora with somewhere else
This place
Banfora
Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.