Bandırma vs Braşov
Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.
Braşov has more tree cover — 45.1% against 11.2%.
Bandırma has cleaner air right now — AQI 33 against 52.
- Tree cover gap
- 33.9 points
- Braşov is ahead.
- Air quality gap
- 19 AQI
- Bandırma is cleaner.
- Trees between them
- 115K
- Braşov has more standing.
Tree cover
Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.
11.2%
45.1%
Air quality index
US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.
33 · Good
52 · Moderate
Trees standing
Estimated from the measured canopy area.
26.4K
142K
Trees still needed
To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.
44.3K
0
CO₂ absorbed each year
By the trees already standing.
581K kg
3.1M kg
Air quality in detail
What each city is breathing
Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Braşov is read from nearby ground stations and Bandırma is modelled — worth knowing, since the two are not quite like for like.
PM2.5
Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.
5.6 µg/m³
12.4 µg/m³
PM10
Coarser particles — dust, pollen, road grit.
8.9 µg/m³
15.5 µg/m³
Nitrogen dioxide
Mostly traffic and combustion.
0.9 µg/m³
48.8 µg/m³
Ozone
Forms in sunlight; peaks on hot, still afternoons.
76 µg/m³
7.9 µg/m³
The last week, day by day
A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.
| Day | Bandırma | Braşov |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Sept | 39 | 27 |
| 23 Sept | 31 | 23 |
| 24 Sept | 35 | 28 |
| 25 Sept | 52 | 37 |
| 26 Sept | 44 | 40 |
| 27 Sept | 37 | 44 |
| 28 Sept | 35 | 42 |
Reading these numbers
What is actually being measured
Tree cover
The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Braşov leads here at 45.1%.
Air quality index
The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Bandırma reads 33 (good) and Braşov reads 52 (moderate) right now.
Frequently asked
Bandırma and Braşov, answered
Which has more trees, Bandırma or Braşov?
Braşov, with roughly 141,686 trees inside its 2 km radius against 26,389. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Braşov has the denser canopy at 45.1%.
Which has better air quality, Bandırma or Braşov?
Bandırma right now, at AQI 33 against 52 — a gap of 19 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.
How many more trees does each city need?
Bandırma needs about 44,296 more to reach its canopy target, and Braşov about 0. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.
Are these two measured the same way?
Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.
Keep going
Other comparisons nearby
- Bandırma vs Mustafakemalpaşa32% tree cover · AQI 31Compare
- Bandırma vs Balıkesir10% tree cover · AQI 32Compare
- Bandırma vs Tekirdağ8% tree cover · AQI 33Compare
- Bandırma vs Nilüfer25% tree cover · AQI 24Compare
- Bandırma vs Ploieşti35% tree cover · AQI 31Compare
- Bandırma vs Piteşti45% tree cover · AQI 29Compare
Build your own
Compare Bandırma with somewhere else
This place
Bandırma
Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.