Bālurghāt vs Mothīhāri
Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.
Bālurghāt has more tree cover — 39.6% against 28.9%.
Bālurghāt has cleaner air right now — AQI 94 against 127.
- Tree cover gap
- 10.7 points
- Bālurghāt is ahead.
- Air quality gap
- 33 AQI
- Bālurghāt is cleaner.
- Trees between them
- 34.7K
- Bālurghāt has more standing.
Tree cover
Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.
39.6%
28.9%
Air quality index
US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.
94 · Moderate
127 · Unhealthy for sensitive groups
Trees standing
Estimated from the measured canopy area.
121K
86.7K
Trees still needed
To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.
0
18.3K
CO₂ absorbed each year
By the trees already standing.
2.7M kg
1.9M kg
Air quality in detail
What each city is breathing
Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Both are modelled, with no ground station close enough to either.
PM2.5
Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.
32.7 µg/m³
45.9 µg/m³
PM10
Coarser particles — dust, pollen, road grit.
36 µg/m³
51.6 µg/m³
Nitrogen dioxide
Mostly traffic and combustion.
6.2 µg/m³
15.6 µg/m³
Ozone
Forms in sunlight; peaks on hot, still afternoons.
129 µg/m³
84 µg/m³
The last week, day by day
A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.
| Day | Bālurghāt | Mothīhāri |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Sept | 98 | 124 |
| 23 Sept | 61 | 68 |
| 24 Sept | 55 | 54 |
| 25 Sept | 51 | 47 |
| 26 Sept | 68 | 48 |
| 27 Sept | 108 | 80 |
| 28 Sept | 133 | 135 |
Reading these numbers
What is actually being measured
Tree cover
The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Bālurghāt leads here at 39.6%.
Air quality index
The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Bālurghāt reads 94 (moderate) and Mothīhāri reads 127 (unhealthy for sensitive groups) right now.
Frequently asked
Bālurghāt and Mothīhāri, answered
Which has more trees, Bālurghāt or Mothīhāri?
Bālurghāt, with roughly 121,421 trees inside its 2 km radius against 86,706. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Bālurghāt has the denser canopy at 39.6%.
Which has better air quality, Bālurghāt or Mothīhāri?
Bālurghāt right now, at AQI 94 against 127 — a gap of 33 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.
How many more trees does each city need?
Bālurghāt needs about 0 more to reach its canopy target, and Mothīhāri about 18,301. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.
Are these two measured the same way?
Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.
Keep going
Other comparisons nearby
- Bālurghāt vs Mohammadpur96% tree cover · AQI 138Compare
- Bālurghāt vs Dinajpur51% tree cover · AQI 93Compare
- Bālurghāt vs Pār Naogaon58% tree cover · AQI 115Compare
- Bālurghāt vs Shibganj91% tree cover · AQI 94Compare
- Bālurghāt vs Birgañj41% tree cover · AQI 151Compare
- Bālurghāt vs Bettiah41% tree cover · AQI 91Compare
Build your own
Compare Bālurghāt with somewhere else
This place
Bālurghāt
Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.