Skip to content
Airleaf

Balıkesir vs Küçükçekmece

Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.

Küçükçekmece has more tree cover — 16.9% against 10.4%.

Balıkesir has cleaner air right now — AQI 31 against 78.

Tree cover gap
6.5 points
Küçükçekmece is ahead.
Air quality gap
47 AQI
Balıkesir is cleaner.
Trees between them
1.5K
Balıkesir has more standing.

Tree cover

Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.

10.4%

16.9%

Air quality index

US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.

31 · Good

78 · Moderate

Trees standing

Estimated from the measured canopy area.

32.7K

31.2K

Trees still needed

To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.

61.6K

24.2K

CO₂ absorbed each year

By the trees already standing.

719K kg

687K kg

Air quality in detail

What each city is breathing

Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Küçükçekmece is read from nearby ground stations and Balıkesir is modelled — worth knowing, since the two are not quite like for like.

PM2.5

Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.

6.4 µg/m³

24.8 µg/m³

PM10

Coarser particles — dust, pollen, road grit.

9.5 µg/m³

39.3 µg/m³

The last week, day by day

A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.

BalıkesirKüçükçekmece· daily US EPA index, last 7 days
0387522 Sept25 Sept28 Sept
Daily air quality index for Balıkesir and Küçükçekmece
DayBalıkesirKüçükçekmece
22 Sept3935
23 Sept2931
24 Sept3143
25 Sept5956
26 Sept5838
27 Sept3534
28 Sept3234

Reading these numbers

What is actually being measured

Tree cover

The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Küçükçekmece leads here at 16.9%.

Air quality index

The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Balıkesir reads 31 (good) and Küçükçekmece reads 78 (moderate) right now.

Frequently asked

Balıkesir and Küçükçekmece, answered

Which has more trees, Balıkesir or Küçükçekmece?

Balıkesir, with roughly 32,673 trees inside its 2 km radius against 31,219. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Küçükçekmece has the denser canopy at 16.9%.

Which has better air quality, Balıkesir or Küçükçekmece?

Balıkesir right now, at AQI 31 against 78 — a gap of 47 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.

How many more trees does each city need?

Balıkesir needs about 61,575 more to reach its canopy target, and Küçükçekmece about 24,199. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.

Are these two measured the same way?

Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.

Keep going

Other comparisons nearby

Build your own

Compare Balıkesir with somewhere else

This place

Balıkesir

Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.