Baia Mare vs Rîbniţa
Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.
Rîbniţa has more tree cover — 48.7% against 45.5%.
Rîbniţa has cleaner air right now — AQI 29 against 40.
- Tree cover gap
- 3.2 points
- Rîbniţa is ahead.
- Air quality gap
- 11 AQI
- Rîbniţa is cleaner.
- Trees between them
- 9.0K
- Rîbniţa has more standing.
Tree cover
Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.
45.5%
48.7%
Air quality index
US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.
40 · Good
29 · Good
Trees standing
Estimated from the measured canopy area.
143K
152K
Trees still needed
To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.
0
0
CO₂ absorbed each year
By the trees already standing.
3.1M kg
3.3M kg
Air quality in detail
What each city is breathing
Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Baia Mare is read from nearby ground stations and Rîbniţa is modelled — worth knowing, since the two are not quite like for like.
PM2.5
Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.
9.6 µg/m³
7 µg/m³
PM10
Coarser particles — dust, pollen, road grit.
13.5 µg/m³
11.6 µg/m³
Nitrogen dioxide
Mostly traffic and combustion.
45.1 µg/m³
1.3 µg/m³
Ozone
Forms in sunlight; peaks on hot, still afternoons.
43.9 µg/m³
64 µg/m³
The last week, day by day
A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.
| Day | Baia Mare | Rîbniţa |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Sept | 23 | 24 |
| 23 Sept | 29 | 22 |
| 24 Sept | 35 | 24 |
| 25 Sept | 35 | 27 |
| 26 Sept | 36 | 27 |
| 27 Sept | 36 | 31 |
| 28 Sept | 28 | 28 |
Reading these numbers
What is actually being measured
Tree cover
The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Rîbniţa leads here at 48.7%.
Air quality index
The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Baia Mare reads 40 (good) and Rîbniţa reads 29 (good) right now.
Frequently asked
Baia Mare and Rîbniţa, answered
Which has more trees, Baia Mare or Rîbniţa?
Rîbniţa, with roughly 151,925 trees inside its 2 km radius against 142,942. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Rîbniţa has the denser canopy at 48.7%.
Which has better air quality, Baia Mare or Rîbniţa?
Rîbniţa right now, at AQI 29 against 40 — a gap of 11 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.
How many more trees does each city need?
Baia Mare needs about 0 more to reach its canopy target, and Rîbniţa about 0. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.
Are these two measured the same way?
Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.
Keep going
Other comparisons nearby
- Baia Mare vs Satu Mare16% tree cover · AQI 25Compare
- Baia Mare vs Cluj-Napoca36% tree cover · AQI 37Compare
- Baia Mare vs Oradea11% tree cover · AQI 23Compare
- Baia Mare vs Nyíregyháza34% tree cover · AQI 22Compare
- Baia Mare vs Bălţi56% tree cover · AQI 24Compare
- Baia Mare vs Chisinau42% tree cover · AQI 65Compare
Build your own
Compare Baia Mare with somewhere else
This place
Baia Mare
Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.