Bağcılar vs Nilüfer
Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.
Nilüfer has more tree cover — 24.6% against 6.1%.
Nilüfer has cleaner air right now — AQI 24 against 79.
- Tree cover gap
- 18.5 points
- Nilüfer is ahead.
- Air quality gap
- 55 AQI
- Nilüfer is cleaner.
- Trees between them
- 58.1K
- Nilüfer has more standing.
Tree cover
Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.
6.1%
24.6%
Air quality index
US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.
79 · Moderate
24 · Good
Trees standing
Estimated from the measured canopy area.
19.2K
77.3K
Trees still needed
To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.
75.1K
17.0K
CO₂ absorbed each year
By the trees already standing.
422K kg
1.7M kg
Air quality in detail
What each city is breathing
Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Bağcılar is read from nearby ground stations and Nilüfer is modelled — worth knowing, since the two are not quite like for like.
PM2.5
Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.
25.6 µg/m³
5.1 µg/m³
PM10
Coarser particles — dust, pollen, road grit.
41.3 µg/m³
6.9 µg/m³
Nitrogen dioxide
Mostly traffic and combustion.
124.9 µg/m³
7.3 µg/m³
The last week, day by day
A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.
| Day | Bağcılar | Nilüfer |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Sept | 49 | 51 |
| 23 Sept | 45 | 28 |
| 24 Sept | 65 | 48 |
| 25 Sept | 66 | 63 |
| 26 Sept | 42 | 67 |
| 27 Sept | 35 | 36 |
| 28 Sept | 37 | 28 |
Reading these numbers
What is actually being measured
Tree cover
The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Nilüfer leads here at 24.6%.
Air quality index
The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Bağcılar reads 79 (moderate) and Nilüfer reads 24 (good) right now.
Frequently asked
Bağcılar and Nilüfer, answered
Which has more trees, Bağcılar or Nilüfer?
Nilüfer, with roughly 77,283 trees inside its 2 km radius against 19,164. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Nilüfer has the denser canopy at 24.6%.
Which has better air quality, Bağcılar or Nilüfer?
Nilüfer right now, at AQI 24 against 79 — a gap of 55 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.
How many more trees does each city need?
Bağcılar needs about 75,084 more to reach its canopy target, and Nilüfer about 16,965. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.
Are these two measured the same way?
Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.
Keep going
Other comparisons nearby
- Bağcılar vs Esenyurt6% tree cover · AQI 32Compare
- Bağcılar vs Arnavutköy38% tree cover · AQI 32Compare
- Bağcılar vs Umraniye19% tree cover · AQI 79Compare
- Bağcılar vs Maltepe31% tree cover · AQI 79Compare
- Bağcılar vs Bursa14% tree cover · AQI 23Compare
- Bağcılar vs Mustafakemalpaşa32% tree cover · AQI 31Compare
Build your own
Compare Bağcılar with somewhere else
This place
Bağcılar
Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.