Skip to content
Airleaf

Bacău vs Kyiv

Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.

Kyiv has more tree cover — 46.8% against 36.6%.

Bacău has cleaner air right now — AQI 24 against 30.

Tree cover gap
10.2 points
Kyiv is ahead.
Air quality gap
6 AQI
Bacău is cleaner.
Trees between them
24.5K
Kyiv has more standing.
Bacău

Romania

Kyiv

Ukraine

Tree cover

Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.

36.6%

46.8%

Air quality index

US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.

24 · Good

30 · Good

Trees standing

Estimated from the measured canopy area.

105K

130K

Trees still needed

To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.

0

0

CO₂ absorbed each year

By the trees already standing.

2.3M kg

2.9M kg

Air quality in detail

What each city is breathing

Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Kyiv is read from nearby ground stations and Bacău is modelled — worth knowing, since the two are not quite like for like.

PM2.5

Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.

5.2 µg/m³

7.1 µg/m³

The last week, day by day

A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.

BacăuKyiv· daily US EPA index, last 7 days
0255022 Sept25 Sept28 Sept
Daily air quality index for Bacău and Kyiv
DayBacăuKyiv
22 Sept2425
23 Sept2226
24 Sept2721
25 Sept3831
26 Sept4842
27 Sept4444
28 Sept3330

Reading these numbers

What is actually being measured

Tree cover

The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Kyiv leads here at 46.8%.

Air quality index

The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Bacău reads 24 (good) and Kyiv reads 30 (good) right now.

Frequently asked

Bacău and Kyiv, answered

Which has more trees, Bacău or Kyiv?

Kyiv, with roughly 129,971 trees inside its 2 km radius against 105,439. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Kyiv has the denser canopy at 46.8%.

Which has better air quality, Bacău or Kyiv?

Bacău right now, at AQI 24 against 30 — a gap of 6 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.

How many more trees does each city need?

Bacău needs about 0 more to reach its canopy target, and Kyiv about 0. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.

Are these two measured the same way?

Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.

Keep going

Other comparisons nearby

Build your own

Compare Bacău with somewhere else

This place

Bacău

Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.