Az Zāwīyah vs Sabha
Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.
Az Zāwīyah has more tree cover — 2.3% against 0.5%.
Sabha has cleaner air right now — AQI 32 against 33.
- Tree cover gap
- 1.8 points
- Az Zāwīyah is ahead.
- Air quality gap
- 1 AQI
- Sabha is cleaner.
- Trees between them
- 5.7K
- Az Zāwīyah has more standing.
Libya
Libya
Tree cover
Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.
2.3%
0.5%
Air quality index
US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.
33 · Good
32 · Good
Trees standing
Estimated from the measured canopy area.
7.2K
1.6K
Trees still needed
To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.
87.0K
92.7K
CO₂ absorbed each year
By the trees already standing.
159K kg
34.6K kg
Air quality in detail
What each city is breathing
Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Both are modelled, with no ground station close enough to either.
PM2.5
Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.
8 µg/m³
7.6 µg/m³
PM10
Coarser particles — dust, pollen, road grit.
14 µg/m³
33.2 µg/m³
Nitrogen dioxide
Mostly traffic and combustion.
8.4 µg/m³
0.6 µg/m³
Ozone
Forms in sunlight; peaks on hot, still afternoons.
49 µg/m³
50 µg/m³
The last week, day by day
A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.
| Day | Az Zāwīyah | Sabha |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Sept | 42 | 68 |
| 23 Sept | 35 | 49 |
| 24 Sept | 40 | 60 |
| 25 Sept | 34 | 50 |
| 26 Sept | 34 | 47 |
| 27 Sept | 38 | 39 |
| 28 Sept | 35 | 31 |
Reading these numbers
What is actually being measured
Tree cover
The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Az Zāwīyah leads here at 2.3%.
Air quality index
The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Az Zāwīyah reads 33 (good) and Sabha reads 32 (good) right now.
Frequently asked
Az Zāwīyah and Sabha, answered
Which has more trees, Az Zāwīyah or Sabha?
Az Zāwīyah, with roughly 7,226 trees inside its 2 km radius against 1,571. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Az Zāwīyah has the denser canopy at 2.3%.
Which has better air quality, Az Zāwīyah or Sabha?
Sabha right now, at AQI 32 against 33 — a gap of 1 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.
How many more trees does each city need?
Az Zāwīyah needs about 87,022 more to reach its canopy target, and Sabha about 92,677. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.
Are these two measured the same way?
Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.
Keep going
Other comparisons nearby
- Az Zāwīyah vs Janzūr3% tree cover · AQI 36Compare
- Az Zāwīyah vs Al Ajaylat2% tree cover · AQI 43Compare
- Az Zāwīyah vs Qaşr Bin Ghashīr6% tree cover · AQI 31Compare
- Az Zāwīyah vs Tripoli2% tree cover · AQI 31Compare
- Az Zāwīyah vs Sirte1% tree cover · AQI 44Compare
- Az Zāwīyah vs Misratah2% tree cover · AQI 34Compare
Build your own
Compare Az Zāwīyah with somewhere else
This place
Az Zāwīyah
Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.